Originally Posted by Fatima502:
“That's a good point Fudd, because SCD 2015 has basically followed a similar pattern to previous years. Two parallels spring to mind: In 2014 Pixie unexpectedly went out in the quarter-final. Helen was 2015's Pixie. In 2008 Tom Chambers won despite only being third on judge's points in final where one couple scored 40/40. Jay was 2015's Tom. We've seen it all before. These things happen on Strictly.
In any case, I can't see any purpose in 'fixing' the Strictly result. Who would gain from the 'fix' ? All the contestants are 'BBC Employees' in that they're all being paid five-figure sums to take part in the show.”
Excellent point. What would be the purpose of fixing the show? What is in it for the fixers? Nothing. No expensive contract is at stake, so the producers do not have a vested interest in who wins.. And to suggest that they do it just to favour their favourites is to accuse them of being childish, which they are not.
I thought the judges got it in the right order. Kellie poured everything she had into it, gave 200% and deservedly topped the leaderboard. I thought her charleston was a little overmarked, not that she made mistakes, but it was a less impressive dance than Georgia's. Georgia also gave her all and I thought she deserved more than one 40. Of the three, it was Jay who seemed ever so slightly under par. At the end of the day, there wasn't a great deal in it.
So the public voted for Jay, based on his performances throughout the series rather than on the night. Viewed in that light, it was a fair result. The winner was the only one of the three who had never been in a dance-off, but he was also the only one never to score a 40.