Originally Posted by madetomeasure:
“Just been reading the comments on the Daily Mail page. What a breath of fresh air that the best rated comments are those accusing the judges of bias and applauding the public for not falling for it, Stark facts: Jay was not in one DO, Kellie was in two. Jay was more well liked than Kellie. Humility and modesty took Jay a long way. People don't like being told what to do and who to vote for and those 4 did that implicitly. It back fired so no she wasn't robbed, but Jay would have been if ALL the GBP were sheep.”
“Just been reading the comments on the Daily Mail page. What a breath of fresh air that the best rated comments are those accusing the judges of bias and applauding the public for not falling for it, Stark facts: Jay was not in one DO, Kellie was in two. Jay was more well liked than Kellie. Humility and modesty took Jay a long way. People don't like being told what to do and who to vote for and those 4 did that implicitly. It back fired so no she wasn't robbed, but Jay would have been if ALL the GBP were sheep.”
Glad to see that people are speaking out against the rubbish they are printing. They just pick up titbits from twitter and forums like this and think it represents the whole of the country. Glad Jay isnt taking any notice of them.




)
and it always will. Think of it this way too......IF KK had won, wouldn't all jay?GG fans be up in arms about the KK tens for imperfect dances, the hollering of the clifton mob in the galleries, the running order again favouring kellie, and the obvious bias of the judges towards KK and against AJ??