There is a lot of difference between the best dancer in the final and the one who does the best dances on the night. For one thing the judges choose 1 dance out of 3 and picking the lowest scoring dance means it is in the lap of the gods whether you get a crowd pleaser or a so-so choice.
After watching for about 12 weeks and finding 1 couple entertained me more than any other, I am not likely to suddenly change my vote to someone who happens to put on a good performance for 2-3 minutes from one who has been excellent and technically good week after week.
I suspect many others thought the same, hence Jay won.
Kellie's showdance was 'more exciting' because the speed & frenetic contortions of the Lindy Hop will always get the crowd up far more than Jay's regular dance theme, but that doesn't make Kellie a better dancer. It wasn't even a great showdance compared to previous years (think Natalie or Tom) but benefited from the low key performances of the previous 2, especially Jay's.
How can anyone compare the couple's choice and say that Kellie's Charleston v Jay's Paso made her a better dancer? One is a crazy jump aboutathon pulling funny faces while the other a strong powerful proper dance. Georgia's Charleston was better than Kellie's Charleston so does that make her a better dancer?
The first dance was the judges' choice and the idea was to see how they have improved since the first attempt and all 3 of them improved 3 totally different dances, QS, Tango and Rumba.
After watching for about 12 weeks and finding 1 couple entertained me more than any other, I am not likely to suddenly change my vote to someone who happens to put on a good performance for 2-3 minutes from one who has been excellent and technically good week after week.
I suspect many others thought the same, hence Jay won.
Kellie's showdance was 'more exciting' because the speed & frenetic contortions of the Lindy Hop will always get the crowd up far more than Jay's regular dance theme, but that doesn't make Kellie a better dancer. It wasn't even a great showdance compared to previous years (think Natalie or Tom) but benefited from the low key performances of the previous 2, especially Jay's.
How can anyone compare the couple's choice and say that Kellie's Charleston v Jay's Paso made her a better dancer? One is a crazy jump aboutathon pulling funny faces while the other a strong powerful proper dance. Georgia's Charleston was better than Kellie's Charleston so does that make her a better dancer?
The first dance was the judges' choice and the idea was to see how they have improved since the first attempt and all 3 of them improved 3 totally different dances, QS, Tango and Rumba.




) on this one.