|
||||||||
Who was best - everyone |
| View Poll Results: Who was best - everyone | |||
| Aisha |
|
0 | 0% |
| April |
|
2 | 2.04% |
| Brett |
|
2 | 2.04% |
| Charleine |
|
16 | 16.33% |
| Dan |
|
0 | 0% |
| David |
|
3 | 3.06% |
| Elle |
|
0 | 0% |
| Gary |
|
0 | 0% |
| Jenny |
|
0 | 0% |
| Joseph |
|
27 | 27.55% |
| Mergim |
|
0 | 0% |
| Natalie |
|
0 | 0% |
| Richard |
|
18 | 18.37% |
| Ruth |
|
1 | 1.02% |
| Sam |
|
0 | 0% |
| Scott |
|
1 | 1.02% |
| Selina |
|
2 | 2.04% |
| Vana |
|
26 | 26.53% |
| Voters: 98. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620
|
Who was best - everyone
It's hardly a surprise who'll be getting my vote
![]() Tough call. Everyone has favourites. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620
|
APOLOGIES FOR KIND OF SPAMMING THE FORUM
also poll up |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
|
Vana without a doubt. Why the f*** he didn't invest her is beyond me. Had the process been the pre-Series 7 process where the winner would become Sugar's apprentice, Vana STILL would have made the final and likely would have been up against Richard over Joseph. Bad PM run on Week 3 aside she was consistently strong each week showcasing a variety of business skills and her pitch in the final was absolutely top notch. And she made the extra effort to go out of her way to tackle every issue Sugar had with her app. And even then it STILL wasn't enough.... for some bizarre reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,746
|
Voted for Vana as I think she has been the best overall despite a bad week as PM. I also think she wiped the floor with Joseph tonight, it was just the finances that screwed her over.
Richard, Joseph and Charleine have also been impressive. Also think Ruth was fired too early. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,116
|
Joseph and Vana were streets ahead of everyone else IMO. Vana professional and likeable (bar week 3...) and Joseph so, so competent.
But Richard was good (and specialised, albeit slippery/slimy) and I wish Ruth had been given another chance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LFLF Research Div
Posts: 49,394
|
Quote:
Vana without a doubt. Why the f*** he didn't invest her is beyond me. Had the process been the pre-Series 7 process where the winner would become Sugar's apprentice, Vana STILL would have made the final and likely would have been up against Richard over Joseph. Bad PM run on Week 3 aside she was consistently strong each week showcasing a variety of business skills and her pitch in the final was absolutely top notch. And she made the extra effort to go out of her way to tackle every issue Sugar had with her app. And even then it STILL wasn't enough.... for some bizarre reason.
She took part in some tasks, but when things turned sour for her, she became a fence-sitter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,745
|
Interesting poll results so far.
There are so many contestants in this poll which barely register, many getting zero votes, and the vast majority of votes are going to four of the final five. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ireland
Posts: 7,470
|
Quote:
Interesting poll results so far.
There are so many contestants in this poll which barely register, many getting zero votes, and the vast majority of votes are going to four of the final five. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GL51 0EX
Posts: 14,094
|
This year needed a none of the above option
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,047
|
Joseph was the proven article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,171
|
Why is Joseph so popular? I can't think of one thing he did well or memorably in the entire process apart from helping Elle lead on the cleaning/decorating task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
|
Genuinely confused why April has any votes at all. She had frankly the worst PM run going right off the bat in Task 1 (not as aggressive as Vana's but still made frankly stupid mistakes) and then went on to make even more stupid mistakes in Task 2 when she got the 35 year old women to advertise a product marketed at senior citizens.
The only moment she had where she showed herself to be good in any way was when she completely buried Charleine during the book task. "Sorry what qualifies you exactly?" "My creative writing degree" That was absolutely amazing, but has no bearing at all on how good or bad April is overall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
Genuinely confused why April has any votes at all. She had frankly the worst PM run going right off the bat in Task 1 (not as aggressive as Vana's but still made frankly stupid mistakes) and then went on to make even more stupid mistakes in Task 2 when she got the 35 year old women to advertise a product marketed at senior citizens.
The only moment she had where she showed herself to be good in any way was when she completely buried Charleine during the book task. "Sorry what qualifies you exactly?" "My creative writing degree" That was absolutely amazing, but has no bearing at all on how good or bad April is overall. Interesting that Scott has no mentions on best or worst side. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 128
|
Vana, with Richard not too far behind. I wish we could have seen more from Ruth, as she was seemingly quite good on the first three tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,853
|
if i could have voted it would have been for Mergim
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:45.


