DS Forums

 
 

Who was best - everyone


View Poll Results: Who was best - everyone
Aisha 0 0%
April 2 2.04%
Brett 2 2.04%
Charleine 16 16.33%
Dan 0 0%
David 3 3.06%
Elle 0 0%
Gary 0 0%
Jenny 0 0%
Joseph 27 27.55%
Mergim 0 0%
Natalie 0 0%
Richard 18 18.37%
Ruth 1 1.02%
Sam 0 0%
Scott 1 1.02%
Selina 2 2.04%
Vana 26 26.53%
Voters: 98. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20-12-2015, 20:54
Alex_McNamee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620

It's hardly a surprise who'll be getting my vote
Tough call. Everyone has favourites.
Alex_McNamee is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 20-12-2015, 20:57
Alex_McNamee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620
APOLOGIES FOR KIND OF SPAMMING THE FORUM
also poll up
Alex_McNamee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 22:16
ShotDownInFlame
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
Vana without a doubt. Why the f*** he didn't invest her is beyond me. Had the process been the pre-Series 7 process where the winner would become Sugar's apprentice, Vana STILL would have made the final and likely would have been up against Richard over Joseph. Bad PM run on Week 3 aside she was consistently strong each week showcasing a variety of business skills and her pitch in the final was absolutely top notch. And she made the extra effort to go out of her way to tackle every issue Sugar had with her app. And even then it STILL wasn't enough.... for some bizarre reason.
ShotDownInFlame is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20-12-2015, 22:51
annie24601
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,746
Voted for Vana as I think she has been the best overall despite a bad week as PM. I also think she wiped the floor with Joseph tonight, it was just the finances that screwed her over.

Richard, Joseph and Charleine have also been impressive. Also think Ruth was fired too early.
annie24601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 00:06
Dan R
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,116
Joseph and Vana were streets ahead of everyone else IMO. Vana professional and likeable (bar week 3...) and Joseph so, so competent.

But Richard was good (and specialised, albeit slippery/slimy) and I wish Ruth had been given another chance.
Dan R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 00:07
Dix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LFLF Research Div
Posts: 49,394
Vana without a doubt. Why the f*** he didn't invest her is beyond me. Had the process been the pre-Series 7 process where the winner would become Sugar's apprentice, Vana STILL would have made the final and likely would have been up against Richard over Joseph. Bad PM run on Week 3 aside she was consistently strong each week showcasing a variety of business skills and her pitch in the final was absolutely top notch. And she made the extra effort to go out of her way to tackle every issue Sugar had with her app. And even then it STILL wasn't enough.... for some bizarre reason.
Her app was dodgy, and not a good investment. If you had 250K you wouldn't invest in her dating game as it's too risky, and would cost a lot more than the winners' prize. All Vana wanted was money to start off the project, then go looking for more investors.

She took part in some tasks, but when things turned sour for her, she became a fence-sitter.
Dix is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 00:32
Alrightmate
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,745
Interesting poll results so far.
There are so many contestants in this poll which barely register, many getting zero votes, and the vast majority of votes are going to four of the final five.
Alrightmate is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 00:44
CGG_12
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ireland
Posts: 7,470
Interesting poll results so far.
There are so many contestants in this poll which barely register, many getting zero votes, and the vast majority of votes are going to four of the final five.
An interesting idea would be just picking out of those who didn't make interviews
CGG_12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 00:56
platelet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GL51 0EX
Posts: 14,094
This year needed a none of the above option
platelet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 04:15
SULLA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,047
Joseph was the proven article.
SULLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 07:50
StratusSphere
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,171
Why is Joseph so popular? I can't think of one thing he did well or memorably in the entire process apart from helping Elle lead on the cleaning/decorating task.
StratusSphere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 17:07
ShotDownInFlame
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,863
Genuinely confused why April has any votes at all. She had frankly the worst PM run going right off the bat in Task 1 (not as aggressive as Vana's but still made frankly stupid mistakes) and then went on to make even more stupid mistakes in Task 2 when she got the 35 year old women to advertise a product marketed at senior citizens.

The only moment she had where she showed herself to be good in any way was when she completely buried Charleine during the book task.
"Sorry what qualifies you exactly?"
"My creative writing degree"
That was absolutely amazing, but has no bearing at all on how good or bad April is overall.
ShotDownInFlame is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21-12-2015, 17:37
Alex_McNamee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 620
Genuinely confused why April has any votes at all. She had frankly the worst PM run going right off the bat in Task 1 (not as aggressive as Vana's but still made frankly stupid mistakes) and then went on to make even more stupid mistakes in Task 2 when she got the 35 year old women to advertise a product marketed at senior citizens.

The only moment she had where she showed herself to be good in any way was when she completely buried Charleine during the book task.
"Sorry what qualifies you exactly?"
"My creative writing degree"
That was absolutely amazing, but has no bearing at all on how good or bad April is overall.
Yeah. Even in that funny moment (which was quite good), it kind of proved that she should've stood up as PM.

Interesting that Scott has no mentions on best or worst side.
Alex_McNamee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2015, 21:39
Joel Bonner
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 128
Vana, with Richard not too far behind. I wish we could have seen more from Ruth, as she was seemingly quite good on the first three tasks.
Joel Bonner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-12-2015, 14:50
JohnStannard
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,853
if i could have voted it would have been for Mergim
JohnStannard is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:45.