Natalie was useless
Results:Who was WORST - everyone
Aisha
9 (7.83%)
April
1 (0.87%)
Brett
1 (0.87%)
Charleine
5 (4.35%)
Dan
8 (6.96%)
David
2 (1.74%)
Elle
4 (3.48%)
Gary
3 (2.61%)
Jenny
3 (2.61%)
Joseph
2 (1.74%)
Mergim
21 (18.26%)
Natalie
26 (22.61%)
Richard
0 (0%)
Ruth
3 (2.61%)
Sam
2 (1.74%)
Scott
0 (0%)
Selina
23 (20.00%)
Vana
2 (1.74%)
Voters: 115. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Who was WORST - overall
2 of 2
Dan failed miserably in a sales task and we didn't get to see if he was good at anything else. We saw Natalie attempt a number of skills and fail in them all.
I voted for Mergim. He was precisely hopeless on every single task he lasted. Nearly as bad as Sarah from the previous year.
Are we talking worst in personality, or worst in ability? For personality for me it'd be Charleine. I thought she was vile. For ability, probably Natalie, who was totally awful, especially at pitching, which she claimed to be good at. Aisha and Mergim were pretty damn bad too in their different ways.
Originally Posted by CGG_12:
“Scott? Seriously? A worse candidate than Natalie, Elle, Dan, Aisha and Mergim?
I think people are really confusing their least favourite with the worst.
I mean how on earth is Selina getting mentions on this!”
“Scott? Seriously? A worse candidate than Natalie, Elle, Dan, Aisha and Mergim?
I think people are really confusing their least favourite with the worst.
I mean how on earth is Selina getting mentions on this!”
If you think about it though, Scott was awful out on task as well! Just take the property one as an example, yes I know the edit might have been against him a bit but it was still horrific performance.
And then he PM'd the pet task which they lost in spectacular style as well. He is down there with those five in the rankings.
I think it would be Natalie followed closely behind by Mergim, Elle and Dan. Their representation on TV makes it difficult to believe that they could even be competent in their jobs.
There were a number of people you could've vote for.
* Selina, for effectively giving up whenever she didn't get her way.
* Dan, for failing in every aspect of the sales task. That could've been passable, but his BR defence was really terrible.
* Mergim, for 1 - trying to sell fish to a vegan shop, 2 - breaking the customers' shelf and 3 - being generally useless.
However, I cast my vote to Natalie, who spent five weeks in the process being genuinely useless.
The squid in week one were disgusting.
That pitch in week two was disgusting.
Her BR attitude in week two was disgusting.
She was the only candidate (bar Jenny, who helped the other candidates) not to buy an item to the specification (BRETT) in week three.
She voiced concerns to the camera in week four, but never told Brett.
And she effectively gave up altogether in week five.
* Selina, for effectively giving up whenever she didn't get her way.
* Dan, for failing in every aspect of the sales task. That could've been passable, but his BR defence was really terrible.
* Mergim, for 1 - trying to sell fish to a vegan shop, 2 - breaking the customers' shelf and 3 - being generally useless.
However, I cast my vote to Natalie, who spent five weeks in the process being genuinely useless.
The squid in week one were disgusting.
That pitch in week two was disgusting.
Her BR attitude in week two was disgusting.
She was the only candidate (bar Jenny, who helped the other candidates) not to buy an item to the specification (BRETT) in week three.
She voiced concerns to the camera in week four, but never told Brett.
And she effectively gave up altogether in week five.
2 of 2
