Originally Posted by madetomeasure:
“About as being as easily led as thinking those 80 marks weren't contrived”
Oh for goodness' sake...
Some people just don't understand how entertainment shows work. It's been obvious to anyone with half a brain for ages that Jay was going to walk this. They kept saying "anyone can win it" but that obviously wasn't true. You only had to look at the bookies' odds to see that.
Kellie and Kevin did do great performances, and their show dance at least deserved a 40. In addition that that - the producers knew that Jay would win, so the others also got their winning moments - Kellie getting recognition for her skill and hard work in terms of good scores, and Georgia being told that Craig would want to employ her. Both were deserved - but they were mentioned publicly (and possibly the tango score slightly inflated) so that supporters of those pairs could still feel happy for them when Jay won.
Judges' scores in the final don't go towards the results. If anything, a lower score is better, as it makes supporters more likely to pick up the phone and vote. If Jay didn't already have it in the bag - him getting a 39 when Kellie had got 40 would probably have been enough to swing it for him.
I've been a 'judge' in an entertainment competition (one where it didn't really matter who won, the main intention was to entertain the audience - much like the Strictly tour format). I was told that part of my job was to criticise the performers if they messed up, so that the audience would be mad at me for being 'mean' to the performers rather than mad at the performers for not doing well. As has been said before, a lot of Strictly is just panto.