• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
Not Going Out
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
oldhag
26-12-2015
Originally Posted by JEFF62:
“Just watched it and have to disagree with most of the comments on here. I thought it was fantastic. I enjoyed it all the way through.”

I wouldn't go that far, but I did enjoy it and laughed out loud a few times. Le face it, it was better than a lot of other crap.
pork.pie
26-12-2015
Originally Posted by avanne:
“....you forgot the cats.”

Naked cats!!!!????
Whedonite
26-12-2015
I like Die Hard and I didn't mind the homage. It just wasn't very funny. I expected to like it, since I read the complaints first. Usually, if an episode is panned here, I enjoy it. That didn't happen this time though. It had some funny moments, but I usually laugh more at NGO.
lundavra
26-12-2015
Originally Posted by oldhag:
“I wouldn't go that far, but I did enjoy it and laughed out loud a few times. Le face it, it was better than a lot of other crap.”

Agree, it was certainly far better than the majority of modern 'comedy' on TV and there ia a long tradition of British comedy programmes occasionally having a dark side them.
Matt35
26-12-2015
Wonder if there will be a new series next year? I'm hoping there is.
jsmith99
26-12-2015
I enjoyed most of it, and thought it was funnier than some of the recent episodes have been.

The only things I weren't happy with were the birth scenes. Why should it be considered appropriate to have scenes of women giving birth at Christmas?
Ollie_h19
26-12-2015
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“I enjoyed most of it, and thought it was funnier than some of the recent episodes have been.

The only things I weren't happy with were the birth scenes. Why should it be considered appropriate to have scenes of women giving birth at Christmas?”

Why not? It happens, you know.
daisydee
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by kiteflyer:
“I found this episode too violent. It is meant to be a comedy. What is funny about a guy in a mask with a gun, threatening to kill and smashing security guards unconscious. I felt uneasy watching it.”

My thoughts precisely.
Originally Posted by Turbulence:
“Ignoring the obvious and predictable PC Brigade comments, this was an absolutely fantastic episode from start to finish! Magnificent! World class in every sense of the phrase. A true Christmas special, funny all the way.. and I'm not even a fan of Not Going Out.”

You surely jest.
Originally Posted by Peter_Gazzard:
“I'm a fan and thought it was ok,darkest episode yet though,only really funny line was when Daisy asked what time Midnight Mass started or something like that”

Reminds me of the time I asked the price of something in the 99p shop..........
Originally Posted by barbeler:
“Same here. I thought it was very enjoyable and very funny throughout. There are some real humourless misery guts on here.”

Just because we all laugh at different things?????
Originally Posted by JamieHT:
“Name calling now, and I'm the unintelligent one? Have you seen every film that came out over 20 years ago? (Cue calls that it was such a massive hit etc.) Some people don't like certain genres, or certain actors (if you can call Bruce Willis an actor - he's a movie star, that's true; actor . . . hmmm??!!) Tell me how I should inform myself to your satisfaction? Should I only watch films that you've watched?? Die Hard may be well regarded as an action film but that's about as far as it goes. If certain people judge other people's intelligence by that one film, then that says more about them than it does me.”

Quite, I've never seen Diehard so wouldn't have made a connection. I was disappointed as I love NGO, this was a bit heavy on violence and short on humour.
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“I enjoyed most of it, and thought it was funnier than some of the recent episodes have been.

The only things I weren't happy with were the birth scenes. Why should it be considered appropriate to have scenes of women giving birth at Christmas?”

Think about it.


I can watch episodes of NGO many times over, but this is one that I won't be watching again.
Jimmy_Carter
27-12-2015
Rubbish.
lundavra
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“I enjoyed most of it, and thought it was funnier than some of the recent episodes have been.

The only things I weren't happy with were the birth scenes. Why should it be considered appropriate to have scenes of women giving birth at Christmas?”

Does the same apply to Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em, Vicar of Dibley and many other comedy programmes that for some strange reason have had a birth scene in their Christmas special?
Scotty_Walden
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“Why should it be considered appropriate to have scenes of women giving birth at Christmas?”

Just have a think of what Christmas commemorates..
Asb81
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by Peter_Gazzard:
“I'm a fan and thought it was ok,darkest episode yet though,only really funny line was when Daisy asked what time Midnight Mass started or something like that”

That sounded like a stupid comment from Daisy but where I live a lot of churches seem to start their Midnight Mass (despite the name) at about 11.30pm so it was actually a perfectly valid question by her for once!
pork.pie
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by Scotty_Walden:
“Just have a think of what Christmas commemorates.. ”

Argos?
SonOfPurple
27-12-2015
I don't mind sitcoms going down the more dramatic route occasionally but the tone plus the extended hour's run meant the funnies were definitely more spread out than they were in the typical half-hour episode. Still not entirely convinced Hugh Dennis as the best replacement for the more quickfire Tim Vine.

The one problem for me with this year's NGO was that I work in a department store - when a siege in a sitcom was followed the next day by a real-world machete attack in a local mall, I damn near resigned for my own safety!
barbeler
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“The only things I weren't happy with were the birth scenes. Why should it be considered appropriate to have scenes of women giving birth at Christmas?”

I think quite a few people entirely missed the ironic intentions of this
jsmith99
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by Ollie_h19:
“Why not? It happens, you know.”

And the rest ....

Originally Posted by barbeler:
“I think quite a few people entirely missed the ironic intentions of this ”

Indeed, we really need an 'irony' smiley.
Styker
27-12-2015
I disagree with most moaning about it. It wasn't brilliant but it wasn't bad either. I don't agree that becuase of recent events in Paris that this programme should not have been shown either, I've never quite got that thinking. If people are really that sensitive, then either don't watch TV as its full of various programmes/films that include such things a lot or stop watching if you didn't realise beforehand what the programme would entail.

Those moaning about it didn't think it was funny but it had a fair few laughs based on how they were messing up as usual in what they said/did. As for the robber, it was completely unrealistic that he could keep on shooting and not reload once. If he did reload, I didn't notice him doing so.

I hope we do see more of Not Going Out with Lee/Lucy as a couple/family and keep Hugh Dennis and his annoying TV wife in it too.
lundavra
27-12-2015
Originally Posted by Styker:
“I disagree with most moaning about it. It wasn't brilliant but it wasn't bad either. I don't agree that becuase of recent events in Paris that this programme should not have been shown either, I've never quite got that thinking. If people are really that sensitive, then either don't watch TV as its full of various programmes/films that include such things a lot or stop watching if you didn't realise beforehand what the programme would entail.

Those moaning about it didn't think it was funny but it had a fair few laughs based on how they were messing up as usual in what they said/did. As for the robber, it was completely unrealistic that he could keep on shooting and not reload once. If he did reload, I didn't notice him doing so.

I hope we do see more of Not Going Out with Lee/Lucy as a couple/family and keep Hugh Dennis and his annoying TV wife in it too.”

Again, isn't that the tradition in 'action' films? People do not run out of ammunition unless it is wanted for dramatic effect. He was not in shot all the time anyway so could easily have reloaded.
ravensborough
28-12-2015
Kudos to Lee Mack for trying something different with the Christmas special and not have the typical Xmas episode. It was tenser than I thought it would be and I really enjoyed it. As others have said it, it wasn't amazing, but it wasn't bad either.
Virtual Paul
29-12-2015
Watched a repeat of the wedding episode over the weekend and that was proper funny throughout. Made me wish they'd stopped at that as it was obviously intended as the final episode with all the flashbacks of the people in the church to earlier episodes and even Tim making a cameo appearance as a very late best man.

The Christmas special was just so poor in comparison. Hope they make a better effort if doing any more.

Very much reminds me of Only Fools and Horses where the walking into the fake sunset at the end of the episode was meant to be the end of the show and they then continued with some very lacklustre specials.

I guess NGO will follow OFAH and have a lot of jokes about the child, with it being born at Christmas. Probably be referred to as Jesus like Rodney in OFAH thinking Damien was the devil, referring to The Omen movies.
lealeeds
29-12-2015
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“And the rest ....



Indeed, we really need an 'irony' smiley.”

Hows about an I feel superior one as well?
Hassaan13
16-12-2016
It's back in January. Details here:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/lat...16/notgoingout
briggsy1
16-12-2016
Not sure I agree with Shane Allen that NGO is quite in the same league as OFAH, Dad's Army and Allo Allo, but it can be quite amusing.
Baz_James
16-12-2016
Originally Posted by briggsy1:
“Not sure I agree with Shane Allen that NGO is quite in the same league as OFAH, Dad's Army and Allo Allo, but it can be quite amusing.”

To be fair he only said it was 'long running and much loved' as they were which I think is fairly incontrovertible. There's no comment on the comparative quality. Having said that it would certainly rank ahead of one of those in my personal opinion.
Hassaan13
17-12-2016
That's odd. The press release seems to have been taken down or moved elsewhere.
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map