Originally Posted by Janet43:
“Not ridiculous. You accused someone you don't know of putting on a fake laugh when there's clear evidence (i.e.when she's been spontaneous elsewhere) that it's her natural laugh. Fair enough if you don't like it, but having a go at someone and accusing them of being fake because of something they do naturally isn't OK.
You're commenting on Catherine Tyldesley, not the character Eva.”
Even more ridiculous now with this response.
My post said it could be fake or real. The point being that just because someone has the same laugh in real life doesn't necessarily make it real, it could still be fake. I gave Carol Vorderman as an example. So I haven't 'accused' Catherine Tyldesley of anything. Even if I had it's not an issue. DS is full of threads making comments about celebs.
If you had read the rest of my post you would have seen that I agreed with another poster and would love to see Eva's character developed and conceded that the mad laugh might well go with the character.
For someone who doesn't like personal comments made about people, it certainly didn't stop you making some sarcastic and rude comments directed at me in your first reply.
Quote:
“ Janet43 Wonder if your laugh (natural or fake) is annoying. Or perhaps you don't laugh.
I've seen her laugh spontaneously and, if it was fake, she'd have had to concentrate on it, which she clearly didn't.
Unfortunate if you find it annoying - perhaps you could tweet her and suggest she puts on a fake laugh that you'd find more acceptable.”
Janet, I've explained my posts to you and pointed out that you are doing much the same to me in your replies as you were accusing me of doing! But please realise this was just a series of comments on a mostly fun forum. So there's really no need for such confrontations and accusations in your replies.