DS Forums

 
 

International Cricket 2016


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2016, 20:00
dtcdtcdtc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
Not before time this was introduced as well...

In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html
dtcdtcdtc is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 02-07-2016, 20:02
mimik1uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,747
Not before time this was introduced as well...

In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html
i hope i get a commission as i have been suggesting this for about 3 years
mimik1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2016, 20:02
dtcdtcdtc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
isn't that just going back to what the rule used to be ?
I didn't realise that

Will mean a lot more dismissals though I think
dtcdtcdtc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2016, 20:12
SULLA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,031
He's lucky that he's the captain because otherwise his place would be under threat
Agreed

Big Change with DRS


The ICC has approved changes to the lbw umpire's call in the DRS playing conditions, with the conclusion of its annual conference in Edinburgh on Saturday. For on-field lbw decisions to be overturned, half of the ball would now need to hit a zone of the stumps that also borders the outside of off and leg stumps. Earlier, half of the ball would need to hit a zone between the centre of off and leg stumps.

An ICC release said: "The size of the zone inside which half the ball needs to hit for a Not Out decision to be reversed to Out will increase, changing to a zone bordered by the outside of off and leg stumps, and the bottom of the bails (formerly the centre of off and leg stumps, and the bottom of the bails)."

The amendment will come into effect from October 1 or from the start of any series using DRS that commences just prior to this date.

The change will benefit bowlers and more batsmen will be given out once on-field decisions are referred as the "zone" the ball needs to hit for the decision to be overturned has increased.


http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html

Lots more lbw's on the way...
I would like to see No loss of appeals for close calls

Not before time this was introduced as well...

In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html
How long before we don't need on field umpires in International cricket

I seem to recall that Boycott was not a fan of extra protection for batters until he has his arm broken. He started wearing an arm guard himself after that.
The difference is that the ball is bowled at the batter

assuming everyone is fit this would be my top 7

cook
hales
vince
root
bairstow
stokes
buttler
Finish with

Woakes
Rashid
Broad
Anderson
SULLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2016, 20:14
dtcdtcdtc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
i hope i get a commission as i have been suggesting this for about 3 years


Who'll make the tea though now that the 3rd umpire has something to do....
dtcdtcdtc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2016, 20:55
makeba72
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North London
Posts: 5,115
I would like to see No loss of appeals for close calls
I think you have to be careful there, though, as otherwise you'd see them review nearly everything.
makeba72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2016, 21:28
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,534
And quite right too. If the Umpire Call is to allow for the margin of error in the ball-tracking system and to allow for umpires to make genuine minor errors of judgement then why should the teams be punished for doing the same?
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 00:55
SULLA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,031
I think you have to be careful there, though, as otherwise you'd see them review nearly everything.
They should only be allowed genuine reviews
SULLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 11:02
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,534
As a quid pro quo they could only be awarded one extra review with the new ball.
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 17:03
mimik1uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,747
They should only be allowed genuine reviews
and who decides what a genuine review is ?
mimik1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 19:51
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,534
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 20:59
mimik1uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,747
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
not disagreeing but i dont think that was what the poster i replied to was suggesting
mimik1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 21:48
makeba72
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North London
Posts: 5,115
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
I think a lot of the reviews would be umpire's call, and although I'm a fan of technology and although I can see a great logic in not losing a review, I do think you'd end up with an awful lot of reviews interrupting the flow of the game.
makeba72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 22:25
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,534
And you would exchange that for having more wrong decisions?
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 22:35
mimik1uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,747
And you would exchange that for having more wrong decisions?
its all about balance imo , i dont think it would be much of a spectacle if we were seeing a 3rd umpire review happening every over
mimik1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 23:13
makeba72
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North London
Posts: 5,115
it's all about balance imo , i dont think it would be much of a spectacle if we were seeing a 3rd umpire review happening every over
I agree.
makeba72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2016, 07:02
dtcdtcdtc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
Wouldn't be against this with Vince moving up to 3, I assume:

Ben Stokes and Jos Buttler would be candidates to play in England's Test side purely as batsmen according to head coach Trevor Bayliss.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/england-...y/1031973.html
dtcdtcdtc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2016, 19:04
Bhaveshgor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,776
Reports that the bangladesh tour will take place in sri lanka or India or the very very unlikely UAE.

Would respect ECB massively if they did this.
CA were really pathetic last year on cancelling the bangladesh tour twice in a short time span when everyone else was happy with the security arrangements.

India will be a great idea considering not sure england will be having much warm up games in india.
Bhaveshgor is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2016, 23:11
SULLA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,031
and who decides what a genuine review is ?
see below
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
This although you could call it Umpires guess.

not disagreeing but i dont think that was what the poster i replied to was suggesting
It was
SULLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2016, 23:16
mimik1uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,747
see below
This although you could call it Umpires guess.

It was
which is not what you said however

your exact words were

They should only be allowed genuine reviews
which mentioned nothing about retaining referrals when its an umpires call
mimik1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 00:19
gomezz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,534
Put it another way: It should not count as a genuine review if both the umpire's "guess" and the technology's "guess" are in agreement that the referral is incorrect and so the number of reviews left should be decremented.
gomezz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 01:48
mimik1uk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,747
Put it another way: It should not count as a genuine review if both the umpire's "guess" and the technology's "guess" are in agreement that the referral is incorrect and so the number of reviews left should be decremented.
without wishing to labour a point of semantics, i agree with that, and have supported teams not losing a review when it is umpires call for quite awhile now, but that was not what was said ...
mimik1uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 06:55
davethecue
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Sunny North
Posts: 8,725
The Gayle Force was at it again in the CPL last night with 108* off 54 balls

Only 11 x 6's this time.....
davethecue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 09:19
Villa
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,063
The Gayle Force was at it again in the CPL last night with 108* off 54 balls

Only 11 x 6's this time.....
And to think Narine bowled 4 overs for 9 runs and 191 was still chased down with 10 balls to spare!
Villa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 17:56
dtcdtcdtc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
Building up for the toss and Tymal Mills and Liam Dawson have been handed their caps.

Looking forward to some quick bowling ...!!
dtcdtcdtc is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:58.