• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
International Cricket 2016
<<
<
152 of 284
>>
>
dtcdtcdtc
02-07-2016
Not before time this was introduced as well...

In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html
mimik1uk
02-07-2016
Originally Posted by dtcdtcdtc:
“Not before time this was introduced as well...

In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html”

i hope i get a commission as i have been suggesting this for about 3 years
dtcdtcdtc
02-07-2016
Originally Posted by mimik1uk:
“isn't that just going back to what the rule used to be ?”

I didn't realise that

Will mean a lot more dismissals though I think
SULLA
02-07-2016
Originally Posted by Thrasymachus:
“He's lucky that he's the captain because otherwise his place would be under threat”

Agreed

Originally Posted by dtcdtcdtc:
“Big Change with DRS


The ICC has approved changes to the lbw umpire's call in the DRS playing conditions, with the conclusion of its annual conference in Edinburgh on Saturday. For on-field lbw decisions to be overturned, half of the ball would now need to hit a zone of the stumps that also borders the outside of off and leg stumps. Earlier, half of the ball would need to hit a zone between the centre of off and leg stumps.

An ICC release said: "The size of the zone inside which half the ball needs to hit for a Not Out decision to be reversed to Out will increase, changing to a zone bordered by the outside of off and leg stumps, and the bottom of the bails (formerly the centre of off and leg stumps, and the bottom of the bails)."

The amendment will come into effect from October 1 or from the start of any series using DRS that commences just prior to this date.

The change will benefit bowlers and more batsmen will be given out once on-field decisions are referred as the "zone" the ball needs to hit for the decision to be overturned has increased.


http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html

Lots more lbw's on the way...”

I would like to see No loss of appeals for close calls

Originally Posted by dtcdtcdtc:
“Not before time this was introduced as well...

In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html”

How long before we don't need on field umpires in International cricket

Originally Posted by gomezz:
“I seem to recall that Boycott was not a fan of extra protection for batters until he has his arm broken. He started wearing an arm guard himself after that.”

The difference is that the ball is bowled at the batter

Originally Posted by mimik1uk:
“assuming everyone is fit this would be my top 7

cook
hales
vince
root
bairstow
stokes
buttler ”

Finish with

Woakes
Rashid
Broad
Anderson
dtcdtcdtc
02-07-2016
Originally Posted by mimik1uk:
“i hope i get a commission as i have been suggesting this for about 3 years ”



Who'll make the tea though now that the 3rd umpire has something to do....
makeba72
02-07-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“ I would like to see No loss of appeals for close calls ”

I think you have to be careful there, though, as otherwise you'd see them review nearly everything.
gomezz
02-07-2016
And quite right too. If the Umpire Call is to allow for the margin of error in the ball-tracking system and to allow for umpires to make genuine minor errors of judgement then why should the teams be punished for doing the same?
SULLA
03-07-2016
Originally Posted by makeba72:
“I think you have to be careful there, though, as otherwise you'd see them review nearly everything.”

They should only be allowed genuine reviews
gomezz
03-07-2016
As a quid pro quo they could only be awarded one extra review with the new ball.
mimik1uk
03-07-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“They should only be allowed genuine reviews”

and who decides what a genuine review is ?
gomezz
03-07-2016
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
mimik1uk
03-07-2016
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.”

not disagreeing but i dont think that was what the poster i replied to was suggesting
makeba72
03-07-2016
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.”

I think a lot of the reviews would be umpire's call, and although I'm a fan of technology and although I can see a great logic in not losing a review, I do think you'd end up with an awful lot of reviews interrupting the flow of the game.
gomezz
03-07-2016
And you would exchange that for having more wrong decisions?
mimik1uk
03-07-2016
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“And you would exchange that for having more wrong decisions?”

its all about balance imo , i dont think it would be much of a spectacle if we were seeing a 3rd umpire review happening every over
makeba72
03-07-2016
Originally Posted by mimik1uk:
“it's all about balance imo , i dont think it would be much of a spectacle if we were seeing a 3rd umpire review happening every over”

I agree.
dtcdtcdtc
04-07-2016
Wouldn't be against this with Vince moving up to 3, I assume:

Ben Stokes and Jos Buttler would be candidates to play in England's Test side purely as batsmen according to head coach Trevor Bayliss.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/england-...y/1031973.html
Bhaveshgor
04-07-2016
Reports that the bangladesh tour will take place in sri lanka or India or the very very unlikely UAE.

Would respect ECB massively if they did this.
CA were really pathetic last year on cancelling the bangladesh tour twice in a short time span when everyone else was happy with the security arrangements.

India will be a great idea considering not sure england will be having much warm up games in india.
SULLA
04-07-2016
Originally Posted by mimik1uk:
“and who decides what a genuine review is ?”

see below
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.”

This although you could call it Umpires guess.

Originally Posted by mimik1uk:
“not disagreeing but i dont think that was what the poster i replied to was suggesting”

It was
mimik1uk
04-07-2016
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“see below
This although you could call it Umpires guess.

It was”

which is not what you said however

your exact words were

Originally Posted by SULLA:
“They should only be allowed genuine reviews”

which mentioned nothing about retaining referrals when its an umpires call
gomezz
05-07-2016
Put it another way: It should not count as a genuine review if both the umpire's "guess" and the technology's "guess" are in agreement that the referral is incorrect and so the number of reviews left should be decremented.
mimik1uk
05-07-2016
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“Put it another way: It should not count as a genuine review if both the umpire's "guess" and the technology's "guess" are in agreement that the referral is incorrect and so the number of reviews left should be decremented.”

without wishing to labour a point of semantics, i agree with that, and have supported teams not losing a review when it is umpires call for quite awhile now, but that was not what was said ...
davethecue
05-07-2016
The Gayle Force was at it again in the CPL last night with 108* off 54 balls

Only 11 x 6's this time.....
Villa
05-07-2016
Originally Posted by davethecue:
“The Gayle Force was at it again in the CPL last night with 108* off 54 balls

Only 11 x 6's this time.....”

And to think Narine bowled 4 overs for 9 runs and 191 was still chased down with 10 balls to spare!
dtcdtcdtc
05-07-2016
Building up for the toss and Tymal Mills and Liam Dawson have been handed their caps.

Looking forward to some quick bowling ...!!
<<
<
152 of 284
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map