|
||||||||
International Cricket 2016 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#3776 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
|
Not before time this was introduced as well...
In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#3777 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,762
|
Quote:
Not before time this was introduced as well...
In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3778 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
|
Quote:
isn't that just going back to what the rule used to be ?
Will mean a lot more dismissals though I think |
|
|
|
|
|
#3779 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,058
|
Quote:
He's lucky that he's the captain because otherwise his place would be under threat
Quote:
Big Change with DRS
The ICC has approved changes to the lbw umpire's call in the DRS playing conditions, with the conclusion of its annual conference in Edinburgh on Saturday. For on-field lbw decisions to be overturned, half of the ball would now need to hit a zone of the stumps that also borders the outside of off and leg stumps. Earlier, half of the ball would need to hit a zone between the centre of off and leg stumps. An ICC release said: "The size of the zone inside which half the ball needs to hit for a Not Out decision to be reversed to Out will increase, changing to a zone bordered by the outside of off and leg stumps, and the bottom of the bails (formerly the centre of off and leg stumps, and the bottom of the bails)." The amendment will come into effect from October 1 or from the start of any series using DRS that commences just prior to this date. The change will benefit bowlers and more batsmen will be given out once on-field decisions are referred as the "zone" the ball needs to hit for the decision to be overturned has increased. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html Lots more lbw's on the way... Quote:
Not before time this was introduced as well...
In a decision concerning calling of no-balls, the ICC will arrange a trial in the coming months to assess if the third umpire could use instant replays to call no-balls more accurately. The trial is likely to take place during an upcoming ODI series and the third umpire will judge no-balls within a few seconds of the ball being delivered and communicate it to the on-field umpire. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/c...y/1031741.html Quote:
I seem to recall that Boycott was not a fan of extra protection for batters until he has his arm broken. He started wearing an arm guard himself after that.
Quote:
assuming everyone is fit this would be my top 7
cook hales vince root bairstow stokes buttler Woakes Rashid Broad Anderson |
|
|
|
|
|
#3780 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
|
Quote:
i hope i get a commission as i have been suggesting this for about 3 years
![]() ![]() ![]() Who'll make the tea though now that the 3rd umpire has something to do....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3781 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North London
Posts: 5,117
|
Quote:
I would like to see No loss of appeals for close calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3782 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,549
|
And quite right too. If the Umpire Call is to allow for the margin of error in the ball-tracking system and to allow for umpires to make genuine minor errors of judgement then why should the teams be punished for doing the same?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3783 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,058
|
Quote:
I think you have to be careful there, though, as otherwise you'd see them review nearly everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3784 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,549
|
As a quid pro quo they could only be awarded one extra review with the new ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3785 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,762
|
Quote:
They should only be allowed genuine reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3786 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,549
|
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3787 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,762
|
Quote:
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3788 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North London
Posts: 5,117
|
Quote:
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3789 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,549
|
And you would exchange that for having more wrong decisions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3790 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,762
|
Quote:
And you would exchange that for having more wrong decisions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3791 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: North London
Posts: 5,117
|
Quote:
it's all about balance imo , i dont think it would be much of a spectacle if we were seeing a 3rd umpire review happening every over
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3792 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
|
Wouldn't be against this with Vince moving up to 3, I assume:
Ben Stokes and Jos Buttler would be candidates to play in England's Test side purely as batsmen according to head coach Trevor Bayliss. http://www.espncricinfo.com/england-...y/1031973.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#3793 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,776
|
Reports that the bangladesh tour will take place in sri lanka or India or the very very unlikely UAE.
Would respect ECB massively if they did this. CA were really pathetic last year on cancelling the bangladesh tour twice in a short time span when everyone else was happy with the security arrangements. India will be a great idea considering not sure england will be having much warm up games in india. |
|
|
|
|
#3794 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,058
|
Quote:
and who decides what a genuine review is ?
Quote:
I think if the technology shows it being an Umpire's Call than that is a genuine review.
Quote:
not disagreeing but i dont think that was what the poster i replied to was suggesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3795 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,762
|
Quote:
see below
This although you could call it Umpires guess. It was your exact words were Quote:
They should only be allowed genuine reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3796 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,549
|
Put it another way: It should not count as a genuine review if both the umpire's "guess" and the technology's "guess" are in agreement that the referral is incorrect and so the number of reviews left should be decremented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3797 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,762
|
Quote:
Put it another way: It should not count as a genuine review if both the umpire's "guess" and the technology's "guess" are in agreement that the referral is incorrect and so the number of reviews left should be decremented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3798 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Sunny North
Posts: 8,728
|
The Gayle Force was at it again in the CPL last night with 108* off 54 balls
Only 11 x 6's this time..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3799 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,063
|
Quote:
The Gayle Force was at it again in the CPL last night with 108* off 54 balls
Only 11 x 6's this time..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3800 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Back on the Road
Posts: 9,956
|
Building up for the toss and Tymal Mills and Liam Dawson have been handed their caps.
Looking forward to some quick bowling ...!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:50.





