• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
International Cricket 2016
<<
<
65 of 284
>>
>
Bhaveshgor
23-03-2016
That was a choke South Africa would be proud off.
alfamale
24-03-2016
If Australia can see off Pakistan then that will set up a brilliant winner goes through match of Aus vs Ind 2pm Sunday.
mimik1uk
24-03-2016
i'm a little worried about us going through now even if we beat sri lanka , we need SA to lose one of their last 2 games as our NRR isn't great
Jamesp84
24-03-2016
Originally Posted by Bhaveshgor:
“That was a choke South Africa would be proud off.”

If it was Pakistan then the allegations of fixing would be getting chucked about.
mimik1uk
24-03-2016
http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-worl...ry/988565.html

not really sure him retiring makes much difference as i doubt he would be getting picked after this tournament anyway

never a player i liked and someone who i dont think ever fulfilled his potential
Clarkie66
24-03-2016
Originally Posted by mimik1uk:
“http://www.espncricinfo.com/icc-worl...ry/988565.html

not really sure him retiring makes much difference as i doubt he would be getting picked after this tournament anyway

never a player i liked and someone who i dont think ever fulfilled his potential”

I've always liked Shane but I'm not surprised about his decision to retire from all internationals as the new players coming through means he was less and less likely to be selected anyway. He usually provided good entertainment with his style and his LBW reviews!
garbage456
24-03-2016
Why is sky sports showing Pakistan vs Bangladesh and not England vs West indies
swingaleg
24-03-2016
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“Why is sky sports showing Pakistan vs Bangladesh and not England vs West indies”

I'm listening on the radio

Windies only made 108

England got to 59 without loss but have lost 6 wickets in the last few overs and 84-6

edit..........8 wickets down, 7 needed off last over
Darren Lethem
24-03-2016
Originally Posted by garbage456:
“Why is sky sports showing Pakistan vs Bangladesh and not England vs West indies”

Possibly not being televised by the host broadcaster.
swingaleg
24-03-2016
3 runs off 4 balls needed/.
swingaleg
24-03-2016
3 off 3.......

oh dear........wicket !

9 down

3 off 2 needed
swingaleg
24-03-2016
Wide !

2 off 2 needed
swingaleg
24-03-2016
1 off 1 needed

game tied at the moment.......supaover !

1 ball left, 1 run needed, 1 wicket in hand !
jake1981
24-03-2016
This is like Bangladesh strike 2 !!
swingaleg
24-03-2016
phew.........ball goes through to the keeper, shy at the stumps misses, England snatch a single to win

wow......that was exciting

mimik1uk
24-03-2016
england were 59-0 after 8 overs and cruising as well

that would have been an almighty collapse to lose that game
Bhaveshgor
24-03-2016
Originally Posted by swingaleg:
“phew.........ball goes through to the keeper, shy at the stumps misses, England snatch a single to win

wow......that was exciting

”

Boom England win, India still stay alive.
India vs West indies becomes a quarter final.
ICC must be begging for India to win they need india to go far in the competition so the women games goes to the next level.
Bhaveshgor
24-03-2016
Originally Posted by Darren Lethem:
“Possibly not being televised by the host broadcaster.”

Host broadcaster ICC TV originally picked England vs West indies tie and some other Australia or England game Can't remember which one.

But ICC TV last minute changed the TV games so every team gets shown at least once.

TBH think ICC TV made the wrong decision they should have picked the best game on paper, they need to showcase the best of women cricket and not have the likes of Bangladesh having 3 games shown, Ireland 1 and Pakistan 2 games.
Bhaveshgor
24-03-2016
Originally Posted by Bhaveshgor:
“Host broadcaster ICC TV originally picked England vs West indies tie and some other Australia or England game Can't remember which one.

But ICC TV last minute changed the TV games so every team gets shown at least once.

TBH think ICC TV made the wrong decision they should have picked the best game on paper, they need to showcase the best of women cricket and not have the likes of Bangladesh having 3 games shown, Ireland 1 and Pakistan 2 games.”

Looks like I was wrong.
was still a wrong decision West indies a former runner up and 1 time champion and 3 time runner up England should be a shoe in TV game.
Bhaveshgor
25-03-2016
Talking about TV games, ICC have been very lucky that in this very long weekend they have most games meaning something barring NZ vs Bangladesh and the WI vs Afganistan game
Pakistan vs Australia must win game for both teams.
West indies vs South Africa must win for South Africa
England vs Sri lanka must win game for both teams.
India vs Australia Must win game for India and Australia and potentially a game that decides 3 teams fates.
South Africa vs Sri lanka A must win game for South Africa
dtcdtcdtc
25-03-2016
Australia win the toss and bat against Pakistan

Finch is back

Spreads calling 174 - 180

I fancy it could be 200.....
Bhaveshgor
25-03-2016
Originally Posted by dtcdtcdtc:
“Australia win the toss and bat against Pakistan

Finch is back

Spreads calling 174 - 180

I fancy it could be 200.....”

agree discussing this on twitter spreads are too low makes the even money chase 159 which is far too low.
would make even money chase 166 so the the spreads should be around 183-189
swingaleg
25-03-2016
Aussies end up on 193

should be enough
Bhaveshgor
25-03-2016
Originally Posted by swingaleg:
“Aussies end up on 193

should be enough”

depends just like Banglore and Mumbai.
Mohali is a chasing ground, fast outfield, small boundaries and large boundaries and mohali often has huge scores chased down.
dtcdtcdtc
25-03-2016
A super over would be good...

Hoping to see Boom Boom at his destructive best
<<
<
65 of 284
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map