Originally Posted by Bhaveshgor:
“I think my suggestion yesterday on twitter and another forum that england declared early was spot on lol.
Quite weird saying this but the longer england batted in the first innings would have given them more time getting 20 wickets lol.
Doubt many would get it here, and not bothered to explain it fully now.
Although the key point is that if england scored more in the first innings, england wouldn't need to bat in the 3rd innings barring resting bowlers.
Basically declaring early cost england 50-70 overs which could have been the difference between a win and a draw.
especially when you considering batting should be the toughest on day 4/5.
hard to blame cook considering I only saw this yesterday after the event.”
“I think my suggestion yesterday on twitter and another forum that england declared early was spot on lol.
Quite weird saying this but the longer england batted in the first innings would have given them more time getting 20 wickets lol.
Doubt many would get it here, and not bothered to explain it fully now.
Although the key point is that if england scored more in the first innings, england wouldn't need to bat in the 3rd innings barring resting bowlers.
Basically declaring early cost england 50-70 overs which could have been the difference between a win and a draw.
especially when you considering batting should be the toughest on day 4/5.
hard to blame cook considering I only saw this yesterday after the event.”
I picked all 6 Lotto numbers on Sunday





