Originally Posted by
Jaccobabe:
“Ayana was amazing
You wonder how fast Caster can run if she actually tried. She didn't seem bothered *at all* outclassing a very good field. I think she could have gotten close to 1.54.00 and even better, and the WR can actually be broken.
Apparently she stopped taking the medicine that reduced her testosterone which kinda makes sense, but they said it was put on hold, so maybe she has to start taking it again, in that case she better break the WR this season
”
For the CAS ruling to be overturned the IAAF have to prove that unnatural testosterone levels give an unfair advantage over other female competitors. It seems like a "Well, duh!" moment especially given Semenya's mediocre times when she
was undergoing the testosterone reduction therapy, but apparently not ...
Does anyone know, does it have to be biological evidence or can they just present a bunch of 'unnatural' race data as proof? E.g., the marked recent improvement in her times since the ruling (as well as the improvements of others who are hyper-androgenic), the fastest ever last 100m in a women's 800m (13.6 off a sub 1:45 700m in Rabat), 27.9 for the last 200 last night after a 1:28.7 600m ... These last 2 are stats that are probably only approached by the old Eastern Europeans who had, you guessed it, elevated levels of testosterone.
It makes me angry because that was such a cracking event last year - new faces on the scene & super-close racing. It was probably the most competitive event of all in Beijing. Now, however, they're all relegated to also-rans who we can barely see on the screen in the home straight as the camera follows Semenya.