Originally Posted by Prince Monalulu:
“The blindingly obvious option of not starting with 20 stone sacks in the first place.
Split it up into smaller sacks and you can use 2 bodies, a rope and wheel on an external wall and haul it up and into a window.
It's not like labour was expensive, women can lift 30 kilo sacks, whole family can get involved, rather than just a few men.
Why did they 'have' to be 20 stone sacks, I'd take a guess they weren't moving 20 stone sacks of goods at the docks and markets around the country or even the world.”
“The blindingly obvious option of not starting with 20 stone sacks in the first place.
Split it up into smaller sacks and you can use 2 bodies, a rope and wheel on an external wall and haul it up and into a window.
It's not like labour was expensive, women can lift 30 kilo sacks, whole family can get involved, rather than just a few men.
Why did they 'have' to be 20 stone sacks, I'd take a guess they weren't moving 20 stone sacks of goods at the docks and markets around the country or even the world.”
Because a wagon would only need to be loaded with a few huge sacks, rather than be stood waiting for loads of small sacks to be loaded.
A trip carrying a sack, by hand, to a wagon takes the same time if you carry a 70lb bag or a 280lb bag.
These men were physically fit and used to working like this.
In my prime I regularly carried 140lb of flour at a time, and I have never been any kind of prize physical specimen





