Originally Posted by Mrs BBV:
“But surely you don't expect interviewers and interviewee to be sharing mutual life experiences? Journalists commentate, some with more credibility than others especially when there has been a professional relationship in the past?
It's nothing to do with me what Jane Moore can or cannot do but her opinion carries more weight as she been with 'the story' since the start and is not just jumping on the bandwagon at the latest development. If every journalist didn't write a story based on their own morality we would have no journalistic output but as a commentator who has previosly interviewed Kristina she has more right to comment and that has more credibility than others despite what goes on in her personal life as that's not the story in hand.
Unpalatable it may be but journalists are not a measure of morality they report the foibles of others for public consumption.”
I don't expect her to share it in the interview with Kristina.
But I do not believe she has any better opinion because Kristina once went on loose women for ten minutes.
Jane was not there at the start of this, only Ben and his wife were there for their marriage breakdown and then Ben and Kristina for when they got together. Jane Moore interviewed her further down the road and also Kristina didn't speak of Ben in that interview.
My thoughts on Jane's own relationships was meaning I am surprised how harsh she is being on Kristina, when her own husband has left behind a broken home before he married her and had their children, you would think someone who has been though it would not be as judgemental on the same matter, but I do find a lot of people are very hypocritical if it means they can be horrible to others.