|
||||||||
Lemmy's death marked the end of Motörhead, really ? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2
|
Lemmy's death marked the end of Motörhead, really ?
Quote:
In an interview with Sweden’s Expressen, drummer Mickey Dee confirmed Lemmy’s death marked the end of Motörhead. “Motörhead is over, of course. Lemmy was Motörhead. We won’t be doing any more tours or anything. And there won’t be any more records. But the brand survives, and Lemmy lives on in the hearts of everyone.”
So that was it? Do you really think they will stop doing what they love? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 253
|
Lemmy was Motorhead, others have come and gone over the years, but Lemmy was the only constant and founder member.
I've no doubt Phil and Mikkey will play together again at some time as a tribute to Lemmy, but Motorhead as a touring band are most definitely over. Seen them over 20 times over the years, and had tickets for both Hammersmith shows later this month and still can't quite believe he has gone, but got loads of great memories of seeing them live. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,401
|
Of course it has. Lemmy WAS Motorhead. I don't think Queen should have continued on without Freddy Mercury either, but at least you can make more of an argument there in terms of Brian May's contribution to the band, but Motorhead without Lemmy just isn't Motorhead anymore.
I am sure the remaining musicians will continue to pursue their art, however. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:23.

