|
||||||||
Wtf?? Can they do that??! |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,483
|
Quote:
Do we think Queen Nancy polled lower than Winston and they've hastily chanted the eviction format to save face/ the extra hundred grand they've paid out on our Nance?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,829
|
It's cheeky, but it's got me sticking around to watch the second part so I guess it's worked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,286
|
Quote:
Do we think Queen Nancy polled lower than Winston and they've hastily chanted the eviction format to save face/ the extra hundred grand they've paid out on our Nance?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,436
|
I think the public would reasonably assume that it was going to work like all the other 'vote to save' times, where the contestant(s) with the fewest votes leave(s).
What if one contestant out of three up for eviction were very popular, and a voter who preferred another of the contestants thought: 'Well I know that my contestant won't get the most votes, but they might get enough to be saved over the third contestant'? So yes it is misleading the voters, but to be honest I can't imagine who votes nowadays anyway - given the constant production meddling and manipulation your vote could easily count for nothing, so why bother and waste your money? |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,114
|
Quote:
yes they can BB are just covering their @$$e$, they want him gone because he's causing so many complaints & Channel 5 producers bottled it & brought in this twist at the last minute too ensure his removal, I'm not complaining tho
![]() He was a definite to go tonight, if it was down to the public vote. Now it's down to the housemates, it could go either way. So BB might just have ensured that he stays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11,976
|
Quote:
I don't understand this logic.
He was a definite to go tonight, if it was down to the public vote. Now it's down to the housemates, it could go either way. So BB might just have ensured that he stays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,483
|
Quote:
I don't understand this logic.
He was a definite to go tonight, if it was down to the public vote. Now it's down to the housemates, it could go either way. So BB might just have ensured that he stays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 15,659
|
Quote:
Do we think Queen Nancy polled lower than Winston and they've hastily chanted the eviction format to save face/ the extra hundred grand they've paid out on our Nance?
..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,851
|
The twist was already written to occurs tonight tbf
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,527
|
They will get around it by saying that they didn't say people were voting to evict but they didn't announce the housemates would be voting to evict until the lines were closed, easy to hoodwink people and they did it no matter what they say. I don't know why people are surprised though, they ALWAYS do this. I stopped voting after the very first time they put someone back into the house that the public had voted out, they won't ever get my money again and I wish others had followed suit.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:33.



He was a definite to go tonight, if it was down to the public vote. Now it's down to the housemates, it could go either way. So BB might just have ensured that he stays.