• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
So the audience votes don't even count
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
SegaGamer
08-01-2016
Originally Posted by paralax:
“I would imagine Winston wants to go, his place in the house is untenable now.”

That is irrelevant surely. If he has recieved more votes to save, and i have a STRONG feeling he has, then this is a joke.
NaughtyNan
08-01-2016
I'm disgusted and offended, want my money back!
Stellen11
08-01-2016
Honestly if anyone spends any money on phone votes after this then you deserve to be lied to and mugged off. This is just a big con.
Styker
08-01-2016
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“I do wonder when exactly this f̶i̶x̶ twist was dreamt up.”

Exactly. If they don't give us the figures on the votes then I think it will be obvious it was Nancy who was supposed to go but they decided to "get/go after" Winston and why? 60 grand his fee for 2 days? Is it worth it for them to have paid that for just 2 days? Unless they used him for the controversy hoping to get more viewers.

He will be a loss to the house because the young ones are so boring imo.
SegaGamer
08-01-2016
Originally Posted by Styker:
“Exactly. If they don't give us the figures on the votes then I think it will be obvious it was Nancy who was supposed to go but they decided to "get/go after" Winston and why? 60 grand his fee for 2 days? Is it worth it for them to have paid that for just 2 days? Unless they used him for the controversy hoping to get more viewers.

He will be a loss to the house because the young ones are so boring imo.”

If they released the voting figures i wouldn't put it past them to fix those as well.

If anyone believes that Nancy got more votes than Winston then they are deluding themselves.
SpiritedAway
08-01-2016
It's a crooked practice, but I'm actually glad for the switch up. Ultimately, I got the result I wanted but had the good sense not to pay for. I do think this "twist" came about early this AM because Nancy wasn't pulling enough votes.
SegaGamer
08-01-2016
Originally Posted by SpiritedAway:
“It's a crooked practice, but I'm actually glad for the switch up. Ultimately, I got the result I wanted but had the good sense not to pay for. I do think this "twist" came about early this AM because Nancy wasn't pulling enough votes.”

See, this kind of argument really grates on me. You're basically saying you are fine with people being conned because the eviction worked in your favour.
JordanP
08-01-2016
It clearly said you are voting to save. Channel 5 have done this a million times before.
benbeez1
08-01-2016
well they did save Kristina
SegaGamer
08-01-2016
Originally Posted by benbeez1:
“well they did save Kristina ”

That's just twisting thing's though. It is very obvious what has happened tonight. Them changing it in writing on their website proves that.
SpiritedAway
08-01-2016
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“See, this kind of argument really grates on me. You're basically saying you are fine with people being conned because the eviction worked in your favour.”

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.

The show has always done wacky things with their evictions post voting. Knowing that, anyone still voluntarily giving this crock money can't cry foul objectively.
Styker
08-01-2016
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“If they released the voting figures i wouldn't put it past them to fix those as well.

If anyone believes that Nancy got more votes than Winston then they are deluding themselves.”

Yep, I have the same thoughts on that as well.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map