They've hastily amended the voting terms to suit their con.

2 of 2

SegaGamer

08-01-2016

Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“The 'one' being referred to is the housemate who gets the most votes. They will be saved fairly via the public vote while BB can do what it likes to suit its own agenda with those who received fewer votes.

The previous terminology was simply that you could vote to save 'a housemate' from any that were up. After all you can vote for more than one housemate if you wish. Even though it sounds the same, this is arse-covering - they haven't changed it to mean the same thing otherwise why change it at all?”

I agree, that is exactly what they are doing.

I don't understand the excuses that get made really. Again and again they will do this, and again and again fans let them off for it.

noodkleopatra

09-01-2016

'A housemate' and 'one housemate' are the same. 'A housemate' never means 'two housemates', nor 'three housemates', nor 'four housemates'.

An apple = one apple.
You can have an apple
You can have an apple. Not two apples. Not three apples. Not four apples.

lynwood3

09-01-2016

Originally Posted by noodkleopatra:
“'A housemate' and 'one housemate' are the same. 'A housemate' never means 'two housemates', nor 'three housemates', nor 'four housemates'.

An apple = one apple.
You can have an apple
You can have an apple. Not two apples. Not three apples. Not four apples.”

Why do you think they recently changed it?

jonnyjackov

09-01-2016

I don't like apples, can I have a banana instead?

Fried Kickin

09-01-2016

Originally Posted by jonnyjackov:
“I don't like apples, can I have a banana instead? ”

Yes we have no bananas

danny_gamer

09-01-2016

No wonder no one votes for this swizz.

Endemol treats it's viewers with utter contempt as ever.

diesels hummin

09-01-2016

As it says "unless otherwise directed you will be voting to save one housemate" (meaning only one) , it will be interesting to see if what happened tonight becomes standard procedure for this series.

2 of 2