One of the BOTS panelists (after being shown a clip of Jeremy (the tats guy) telling someone why he nominated Nancy) said that he was just backtracking and trying to redeem himself with the others by coming up reasons as to why he picked to evict Nancy.

But he was one of the first to nominate so he couldn't have known that ALL the other votes would go Winston's way...and his reason was a justified one for him, he is allowed to nominate whoever he likes and shouldn't just vote like a sheep for the hate figure of the day according to others.

If anyone should have been picked up on with their nomination is Angie...she simply said she was nominating Winston to save her fellow female...which is not just pathetic as a reason but certainly not valid by BB rules.

I agree, they vilified him because they didn't like him going against what they thought was the right thing to do. It seem's like you're not allowed your own opinions on this show anymore.

Sheep don't like it when someone goes against the grain. We see it year after year. It will be interesting to see if this bunch start picking at Jeremy like has happened previous years once a target shows themselves. Don't thi8nk it would work this time..

I agree OP but does Jeremy. It seemed to me that the panelist was saying what Jeremy was doing rather than what he should be doing and that is how it looked in the clip. Jeremy seemed desperate to defend himself for his nomination but I couldn't see anyone questioning him about it.

It is Jeremy that feels bad about not being a sheep I'm afraid

i lost what little respect i had for him when he saved winston because he hadn't done anything to him. it might just be me, but if i was in the house and someone had incredibly offensive views on black people or muslims i wouldn't let it slide just because i am white and they've been nice to me. i think that is incredibly selfish and inconsiderate to the overwhelming majority in the house who have been offended by his views.

It's already justified, imo. He was asked to pick between two people and he picked the one he'd consistently disliked the most during his time in the house. If it had been anyone other than Nancy he'd have likely picked Winston along with everyone else, but he'd already admitted Nancy intimidated him and wouldn't listen to him when he tried to talk to her, so he wanted her gone.

Exactly. I'm not a fan, but it's good that he went from HIS time in the house. He obviously nominated her for his killer nomination and had more of a problem with her than Winston.

In fact despite Winston's comments being beyond disgusting and unbelievable, Jeremy was the person that actually did what should be done... vote someone for what they have done in the house. The others voted Winston due to:

a) the crowd
b) The task revealing his comments made outside

Mmmmmmm reminds me of Chloe Wilburn re: Helen

She wouldn't join in the Helen bashing nor express an opinion of Helen to her fellow HMs because she hasn't done anything bad to her. *rolls her eyes*

The vote should have been based on the individual's persona in the house.

Winston's behaviour, towards some of the females was shown to be creepy. This wasn't mentioned. Also, Angie wasn't honest about her reasons for picking him.

That comment attributed to him, during the task, was a set-up by the production team. Plus, Emma's cold and frosty interview was unprofessional.

I felt uncomfortable about the whole scenario.