Originally Posted by
tiggerpooh:
“This is off topic also, but is slightly relevant to the OP's question. I remember when I watched both Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows movies, the picture looked darker than the other HP movies, plus a bit misty.
Dunno if the director wanted that look deliberately, but I found it difficult to watch at times.
Shame to end the Harry Potter film series like that.
”
The Harry Potter films gradually got tonally darker as they went along, not just in terms of plotting but in terms of colour pallet. You only need to look at the
film logos to see that representation - they gradually went from vivid gold, to silver, to a dull stone grey, to a dark black stone hue.
In an old photography job of mine, it was a bit of a well established daft joke that there was secretly a ninth Harry Potter film but nobody could find it as it was too dark to see.
In reflection I think the Harry Potter series is a complete mess. Stunning actor assemblage, but otherwise it's all over the place. The first film really frustrates with its "holy cricket!" approach to being British, not helped by young actors who hadn't come into their own. Whilst the later films got darker, but in a way that felt like they were constantly trying to replicate the success of Alfonso Cuaron's Prisoner of Azkaban - generally regarded as the strongest and most visually stunning in the series - rather than actually carve out their own identity.
I don't rate David Yates at all as a director. He directed the final four films in the series and there is something very conservatively bland about them. They lost the magic of the earlier films and Hogwarts felt like any old boarding school for the middle classes. Not to have a rant about that

I was disappointed when he was confirmed for the new Fantastic Beasts film as well.
Someone once suggested him on a thread here though as an ideal candidate for directing an episode of Doctor Who. I really don't think he'd be anything special beyond being a slightly familiar name to some.