• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
That singing was pre-recorded....
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
This singing is pre recorded, they're miming - don't be fooled!!!

Listen to all the added effects, such as delay and compression, and the perfect and stable sound levels, regardless to where the mic is being held or how much it's moving....
Wainy84
10-01-2016
Wouldn't surprise me one bit.
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Wainy84:
“Wouldn't surprise me one bit.”

LOL, I'd bet my last quid that the producers had them recording those in the back throughout the day...or maybe even before entering the show! Megan & Darren's in particular....

The benefits of no live feed for the producers!
Wainy84
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Jay Bigz:
“LOL, I'd bet my last quid that the producers had them recording those in the back throughout the day...or maybe even before entering the show! Megan & Darren's in particular....

The benefits of no live feed for the producers!”

I agree.
Flo71
10-01-2016
I saw Darren live last summer and he can sing, not saying he is my favourite singer but he does have a good singing voice. And he was in Joseph many years where he would have sang live every show.

No idea about Megan liking her less as its going on.
DUNDEEBOY
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Flo71:
“I saw Darren live last summer and he can sing, not saying he is my favourite singer but he does have a good singing voice. And he was in Joseph many years where he would have sang live every show.

No idea about Megan liking her less as its going on.”

They were definitely singing
BeeBumble
10-01-2016
Why would they bother doing that? Genuine question.
cavalli
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“They were definitely singing”

Well their lips were certainly moving.
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by BeeBumble:
“Why would they bother doing that? Genuine question.”

For the viewers benefit. So everyone can be like 'wow, Megan's voice is amazing'

If that was live just then, this would have been more of a pub karaoke affair....

The performance levels were perfect for a few them.
Robinson1
10-01-2016
It wasn't recorded because Daniella just stood there bemused when Gemma went wrong
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“They were definitely singing”

Miming to previous recordings of their singing - professionals do it all the time for 'live performances' on shows.
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Robinson1:
“It wasn't recorded because Daniella just stood there bemused when Gemma went wrong ”

Megan & Darrens definitely were - the others were debatable....
Fanntastik
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Jay Bigz:
“For the viewers benefit. So everyone can be like 'wow, Megan's voice is amazing'

If that was live just then, this would have been more of a pub karaoke affair....

The performance levels were perfect for a few them.”

but they usually like the HMs humiliating themselves. I don't see why they'd change their minds about it now.
Yorkshire Steve
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Jay Bigz:
“This singing is pre recorded, they're miming - don't be fooled!!!

Listen to all the added effects, such as delay and compression, and the perfect and stable sound levels, regardless to where the mic is being held or how much it's moving....”

Well thats easy to do. You just add those effects on the sound desk as they are singing. Also no problem to keep the sound levels correct by working them on the desk. Darren can sing, that's generally how he makes a living. He's also a very good impressionist. There was no need to pre record, as most of them could sing to an acceptable level. The ones who couldn't, danced!
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Yorkshire Steve:
“Well thats easy to do. You just add those effects on the sound desk as they are singing. Also no problem to keep the sound levels correct by working them on the desk. Darren can sing, that's generally how he makes a living. He's also a very good impressionist. There was no need to pre record, as most of them could sing to an acceptable level. The ones who couldn't, danced!”

Haha - I know all this, I have a degree in Music Technology. That's how I know a few of them were mixed and mastered first.

I'm not denying that they're good singers - they definitely are. It's just the quality of the overall sound was too glossy and perfect, meaning they were pre recorded and mimed.

When a mic is moved around in your hand, here there and everywhere, this is reflected right away and can even cause feedback. Only trained professional singers know how to hold a mic steady and calm to get a stable level. Darren's was all over the place but the levels didn't change it all.
mellick
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Jay Bigz:
“This singing is pre recorded, they're miming - don't be fooled!!!

Listen to all the added effects, such as delay and compression, and the perfect and stable sound levels, regardless to where the mic is being held or how much it's moving....”

That does not mean they were miming, effects can be added on the fly or/and in post production
Flo71
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Robinson1:
“It wasn't recorded because Daniella just stood there bemused when Gemma went wrong ”

Went wrong? PMSL surely none of that was rehearsed. Daniella just stood there like a dumb fool, she has zero personality, was Gemma supposed to do the same.
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Fanntastik:
“but they usually like the HMs humiliating themselves. I don't see why they'd change their minds about it now.”

These are celebs with reputations on the line. When signing up for the show, things like this would obviously be discussed e.g Will I have to sing/dance. Terms will be then be agreed....
cavalli
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Jay Bigz:
“Megan & Darrens definitely were - the others were debatable....”

Maloney sounded just as shit as I remembered.
minxymoo
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by BeeBumble:
“Why would they bother doing that? Genuine question.”

people over analyzing on DS...theres a surprise.
Wainy84
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Jay Bigz:
“Haha - I know all this, I have a degree in Music Technology. That's how I know a few of them were mixed and mastered first.

I'm not denying that they're good singers - they definitely are. It's just the quality of the overall sound was too glossy and perfect, meaning they were pre recorded and mimed.

When a mic is moved around in your hand, here there and everywhere, this is reflected right away and can even cause feedback. Only trained professional singers know how to hold a mic steady and calm to get a stable level. Darren's was all over the place but the levels didn't change it all.”

I know what you mean. I agree.
minxymoo
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by cavalli:
“Maloney sounded just as shit as I remembered.”

Rhumbatugger
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Jay Bigz:
“For the viewers benefit. So everyone can be like 'wow, Megan's voice is amazing'

If that was live just then, this would have been more of a pub karaoke affair....

The performance levels were perfect for a few them.”


I thought a couple sounded a bit unnaturally produced, but others sounded 'real'.
mellick
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by cavalli:
“Maloney sounded just as shit as I remembered.”

I thought he was going to sing 'There's noone quiet like grandma'
Jay Bigz
10-01-2016
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“I thought a couple sounded a bit unnaturally produced, but others sounded 'real'.”

Yeah I think Maloney's was live but only caught the end....

Megan's and Darrens were 100% recorded beforehand - that's showbiz! Not sure why some in this thread find that so hard to believe.
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map