|
||||||||
Emmerdale - Past and Present (Part 10) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#5226 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Usually when a couple on soap starts talking about trying for a baby, I assume it's going to lead do either a infertility or a miscarriage storyline, because planned babies do not exist in the world of TV, and I think your idea would be a much better story then another affair storyline, and giving Finn something to do is fine by me.
But after the Victoria/Ross scenes on Friday and with Adam Thomas taking a break to go into the jungle, I think Al is right. Although I won't complain if we're completely wrong ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#5227 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: T'North
Posts: 14,542
|
Quote:
If they do go down the Ross/Victoria route, I wont judge it too quickly. They cant be any worse than Ross/Debbie, plus it doesn't have to be an affair. Vic and Adam could easily just drift apart, and then Ross could swoop in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5228 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
If they do go down the Ross/Victoria route, I wont judge it too quickly. They cant be any worse than Ross/Debbie, plus it doesn't have to be an affair. Vic and Adam could easily just drift apart, and then Ross could swoop in.
On another note was listening to this song the other day and I've realized this is Ross' theme song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5gjZUhDqJg
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5229 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Victoria and Ross have zero chemistry and it make Ross look pathetic and evil going after another brother's wife.
On another note was listening to this song the other day and I've realized this is Ross' theme song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5gjZUhDqJg |
|
|
|
|
|
#5230 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
I disagree on the chemistry bit, I think they have loads. It helps that they are together in real life, obviously chemistry is there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5231 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
I have seen a lot of real life couples that have zero chemistry when they pair their characters together. Like David and Debbie would be terrible or could imagine Rhona and Cain?
![]() Also does Ross really see Adam as his brother? Is Adam really his brother? It could of easily been Ross' sock that James got out of that washing basket.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5232 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
David and Debbie would probably work, both dull as dishwater. I think in many ways Vic is similar to Donna- She's a normal girl, shes caring, she has morals but she has a feisty side aswell. We have only seen her have a few scenes with Ross, so all Im saying is that if they do pair them together I'll give it a while before I decided if they are decent or not.
Also does Ross really see Adam as his brother? Is Adam really his brother? It could of easily been Ross' sock that James got out of that washing basket. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5233 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Either way Adam is still family and you just don't go after a family member's spouse, be it brother or cousin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5234 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 8,047
|
Quote:
Normal people with morals wouldnt, but its Ross.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5235 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
But you have to draw the line somewhere, Ross should not be a completely evil character with no morals, plus it would make Victoria look really bad and since she grew up witnessing the the Andy/Robert drama it would be stupid of her get herself involved in something that could be so destructive to a family.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5236 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: T'North
Posts: 14,542
|
Quote:
Also does Ross really see Adam as his brother? Is Adam really his brother? It could of easily been Ross' sock that James got out of that washing basket.
![]() I remember think Kevin using Jack's dummy in Corrie was bad, but I'm more inclined to believe that than sock one! It was the most unrealistic DNA test I have ever seen on TV
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5237 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
That was bloody ridiculous, wasn't it? I'm pretty sure IRL they either use a swab inside the cheek or draw a blood sample, and I suppose Rebecca using hair was fairly realistic too, but a sock from the washing basket full of other peoples dirty clothes? Surely it wouldn't have one trace of DNA on it, but a bit of everyone's. How did James not get a letter back saying "get us a proper sample, idiot!"
I remember think Kevin using Jack's dummy in Corrie was bad, but I'm more inclined to believe that than sock one! It was the most unrealistic DNA test I have ever seen on TV ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5238 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Losing the plot and not caring
Posts: 68,975
|
Quote:
That was bloody ridiculous, wasn't it? I'm pretty sure IRL they either use a swab inside the cheek or draw a blood sample, and I suppose Rebecca using hair was fairly realistic too, but a sock from the washing basket full of other peoples dirty clothes? Surely it wouldn't have one trace of DNA on it, but a bit of everyone's. How did James not get a letter back saying "get us a proper sample, idiot!"
I remember think Kevin using Jack's dummy in Corrie was bad, but I'm more inclined to believe that than sock one! It was the most unrealistic DNA test I have ever seen on TV ![]() The point is, if no character argues the point it's because we're supposed to take it as fact. Same with Moses being Dross's spawn - knowing Charity as we do, he could've been pretty much anybody's lol, but Dross didn't query it, ask for proof etc because ED have decided 'it's a fact' and the sl moves from there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5239 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: East Kilbride, Scotland
Posts: 4,343
|
Quote:
Tbf, to fit the sl, it was clearly mentioned that even though Adumb had left home, Moira still did his washing for him, so at least in theory that dirty washing basket was all his stuff for Moira to collect and wash for him. Sweat (and the socky skin flakes) is a decent enough medium for DNA collection.
The point is, if no character argues the point it's because we're supposed to take it as fact. Same with Moses being Dross's spawn - knowing Charity as we do, he could've been pretty much anybody's lol, but Dross didn't query it, ask for proof etc because ED have decided 'it's a fact' and the sl moves from there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5240 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Losing the plot and not caring
Posts: 68,975
|
Quote:
Until, of course, they decide it's not fact and retcon it all with an off-screen explanation.
![]() ![]() I mentioned it once but I think I got away with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5241 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 18,115
|
Quote:
Tbf, to fit the sl, it was clearly mentioned that even though Adumb had left home, Moira still did his washing for him, so at least in theory that dirty washing basket was all his stuff for Moira to collect and wash for him. Sweat (and the socky skin flakes) is a decent enough medium for DNA collection.
The point is, if no character argues the point it's because we're supposed to take it as fact. Same with Moses being Dross's spawn - knowing Charity as we do, he could've been pretty much anybody's lol, but Dross didn't query it, ask for proof etc because ED have decided 'it's a fact' and the sl moves from there. And (as Sam Cains points out) - it gives the show free will to backtrack and retcon the event anytime they might feel is necessary. |
|
|
|
|
#5242 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: T'North
Posts: 14,542
|
Quote:
Tbf, to fit the sl, it was clearly mentioned that even though Adumb had left home, Moira still did his washing for him, so at least in theory that dirty washing basket was all his stuff for Moira to collect and wash for him. Sweat (and the socky skin flakes) is a decent enough medium for DNA collection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5243 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,012
|
Quote:
I forgot that, suppose it makes a little more sense then.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5244 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Losing the plot and not caring
Posts: 68,975
|
Quote:
It makes about as much sense as Sammeh trying to do soduku
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5245 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,856
|
Quote:
Tbf, to fit the sl, it was clearly mentioned that even though Adumb had left home, Moira still did his washing for him, so at least in theory that dirty washing basket was all his stuff for Moira to collect and wash for him. Sweat (and the socky skin flakes) is a decent enough medium for DNA collection.
The point is, if no character argues the point it's because we're supposed to take it as fact. Same with Moses being Dross's spawn - knowing Charity as we do, he could've been pretty much anybody's lol, but Dross didn't query it, ask for proof etc because ED have decided 'it's a fact' and the sl moves from there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5246 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Losing the plot and not caring
Posts: 68,975
|
Quote:
What would be Charitys reason to lie about Ross being Moses' dad?
I'm not saying she necessarily did lie, but it's just another example whereby irl, he wouldn't just take her word for it - he would've wanted a dna test, considering he and everyone else knows Charity shags anybody she can make use of. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5247 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: It's CHRISTMASSSSSS!
Posts: 2,943
|
Not a bad week of episodes this week
Aside from Elizabeth Estensen's overacting
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5248 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Carlisle
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
I've forgotten the background to it now - did she want to make sure Debbie stayed away from him? Or she wanted to use him in one of her schemes?
I'm not saying she necessarily did lie, but it's just another example whereby irl, he wouldn't just take her word for it - he would've wanted a dna test, considering he and everyone else knows Charity shags anybody she can make use of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5249 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,392
|
Quote:
Its cheap piss-poor storytelling is what it is - throwing something together with the vaguest of credibility and assuming that the audience is too enamoured with the *shockingness / twist / sensationalism (*delete as you deem appropriate) - to question the sophistication (or lack of it) of the actual narrative.
And (as Sam Cains points out) - it gives the show free will to backtrack and retcon the event anytime they might feel is necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5250 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 39,633
|
Quote:
It can always be brought up again when Moses is 10 if the writers ever run out of storylines
![]() I know it's too late for this, but heck, I can dream. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:16.







Aside from Elizabeth Estensen's overacting