Originally Posted by tabithakitten:
“I think you do have preconceptions even if you don't realise/admit it. Your opinion is so vehement about those dances you perceive as iconic that I think it's impossible for you not to pre-judge however much you may want to (and believe you are) stay(ing) objective. Again, I'm not judging you or trying to cast aspersions (how could I? I don't know you and my opinion, such as it is, may well be wrong. But I do think that anyone who has such strong views about reusing music that has been used for very memorable performances will find it exceptionally difficult/impossible to view another dance to the same track without automatically expecting it to be not as good which is tantamount to a preconception.
I do wonder what you meant by "that's where the difference lies". What difference? The difference between me and you? Because I don't think I do "fawning" either.
This exchange has led me to think of something though (I know - I've had a thought! Give it a welcome, it's an only child!)
You'd probably hate this, but I'd rather relish the idea of Strictly's more able celebs swapping their more memorable tracks and seeing how they got on with someone else's iconic dance music. Jill, Chelsee, Scott and Jay could swap jive tracks, Natalie Gumede could do "Crazy In Love", Georgia, Sophie, Denise and Chris could swap Charleston tracks (the girls would be fine, he'd be bloody awful), Mark and Rachel could swap AT tracks and Alesha could salsa to "Hot Hot Hot". There are, of course, many others I haven't mentioned.
Sorry. That's a very long post and I do realise I've taken the thread in a rather different direction. Mind you, I don't think I was the first to do that
.”
“I think you do have preconceptions even if you don't realise/admit it. Your opinion is so vehement about those dances you perceive as iconic that I think it's impossible for you not to pre-judge however much you may want to (and believe you are) stay(ing) objective. Again, I'm not judging you or trying to cast aspersions (how could I? I don't know you and my opinion, such as it is, may well be wrong. But I do think that anyone who has such strong views about reusing music that has been used for very memorable performances will find it exceptionally difficult/impossible to view another dance to the same track without automatically expecting it to be not as good which is tantamount to a preconception.
I do wonder what you meant by "that's where the difference lies". What difference? The difference between me and you? Because I don't think I do "fawning" either.
This exchange has led me to think of something though (I know - I've had a thought! Give it a welcome, it's an only child!)
You'd probably hate this, but I'd rather relish the idea of Strictly's more able celebs swapping their more memorable tracks and seeing how they got on with someone else's iconic dance music. Jill, Chelsee, Scott and Jay could swap jive tracks, Natalie Gumede could do "Crazy In Love", Georgia, Sophie, Denise and Chris could swap Charleston tracks (the girls would be fine, he'd be bloody awful), Mark and Rachel could swap AT tracks and Alesha could salsa to "Hot Hot Hot". There are, of course, many others I haven't mentioned.
Sorry. That's a very long post and I do realise I've taken the thread in a rather different direction. Mind you, I don't think I was the first to do that
.”
Well, you think I have pre conceptions, I don't. We have to agree to disagree and stop here otherwise the argument would never end.
The comment about fawning it wasn't directed at you. It was a statement about me being objective and the difference between a "normal" fan and a fanatic - although the word fan is a derivative of fanatic, but the later has a different connotation (so to speak).
Re your swapping idea, you could get in touch with TPTB. You never know, they might take it up on that for future specials such as Christmas and Children in Need, good luck with that.




, and secondly, too much real life gets in the way!!!