Originally Posted by What name??:
“Then he was hardly that influential was he....? Because loads of people try to sound and dance like MJ. And that is a measure of how influential he was”
Some would argue that without someone like Bowie, MJ wouldn't have been what he became. I am no particular fan of Bowie buit I can see that he stood on the cusp of a sea change in popular culture. I am not sure if he was soley responsible or just a leading figure in an overall movement but things certainly changed.
Before in the early 60's bands were just bands. They might kit themselves out in matching outfits but otherwise they turned up, stood and played or sang and that was that.
Bowie (and maybe others) turned making music into performance art. So the visual presentation became as much a pert of the art as the audio. He blurred the lines between theatre and music. He blurred the lines about gender. He drove the idea of writing and producing music as a fictional character in a way I don't think had been done before, but then inspired by plenty who followed.
A creation like MJ's persona in Thriller could well be attributed to the process Bowie started. Bowie lead the idea of reinventing one's creative persona. I wonder if MTV would have come about if Bowie hadn't already established the visual/audio link so strongly. MTV facilitated the global stardom of both Madonna and Jackson. I bet if MJ had been around today he would have paid his respects and acknowledged being influenced by Bowie