• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
what if a male hm acted the way megan did
Norn2
15-01-2016
would they have been ejected? i think so

i think even if tiffany acted the way megan did, she would have been ejected
broadshoulder
15-01-2016
Yep, thrown out...
Verence
15-01-2016
Jason and Victor weren't thrown out after Fight Night

But then if everyone involved in Fight Night had been thrown out there would only have been a handful of HMs left.. Ahmed, Dan and Stu probably would have stayed
broadshoulder
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Verence:
“Jason and Victor weren't thrown out after Fight Night

But then if everyone involved in Fight Night had been thrown out there would only have been a handful of HMs left.. Ahmed, Dan and Stu probably would have stayed”

It was orchestrated by that northern girl...
Belpry_1
15-01-2016
I agree,

Any male or non-white female would have got a much harsher punishment i.e kicked out

Blatant double standards.
ChipDouglas82
15-01-2016
If a male housemate acted the way Megan did, then we wouldn't half the amount of threads slagging him off.

Would probably get tons of sympathy with coments like "Don't be so harsh on him, hes probably stressed in that house! or "They've not got any decent food, I'd be the same!" etc etc.

But because Megan is a woman, she gets judged far more harshly for her actions! I've seen it year after year on here!
Salv*
15-01-2016
To be honest:

BB5:

Victor and Jason for Fight Night
Ahmed for smashing plates and damaging equipment.

BB6:

Science- For chucking a bin at Maxwell and throwing stuff at HMs
Maxwell- For aggressive and verbal behaviour...putting a scab in Science's food.
Roberto- For throwing a plate of pasta over Maxwell

The only reason HMs have been ejected are due to innapropriate actions against people's will (Daley and Jeremy), racist or un PC comments (Emily, Ken) etc...
KT_Dog
15-01-2016
What if she'd been gay?
What if she'd been black?
What if she'd been a fatty?
What if she'd been Helen?
What if she'd been Nikki Grahame?
What if she'd been Gary Busey? (Honk!)
mellick
15-01-2016
And to think Nick Bateman was thrown out for writing names on bits of paper and demonised by the whole country for doing so, but these days Helen, Farrah, Megan type behaviour is ignored or results in a feeble warning
Bacon&Eggs
15-01-2016
Pressure cooker meets person blowing off steam, what's the problem?

At least she's proven she's got some balls. Not afraid of pissing off the masses that one i reckon.
ChipDouglas82
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Bacon&Eggs:
“Pressure cooker meets person blowing off steam, what's the problem?

At least she's proven she's got some balls. Not afraid of pissing off the masses that one i reckon.”

I think some people on here still live in the 1920's where women weren't allowed to express an opinion!!!
meadows76
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“If a male housemate acted the way Megan did, then we wouldn't half the amount of threads slagging him off.

Would probably get tons of sympathy with coments like "Don't be so harsh on him, hes probably stressed in that house! or "They've not got any decent food, I'd be the same!" etc etc.

But because Megan is a woman, she gets judged far more harshly for her actions! I've seen it year after year on here!”

Megan didn't get judged because she is a woman, she got judged because she is a ****
Sasparella
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“I think some people on here still live in the 1920's where women weren't allowed to express an opinion!!!”

No some on here live in the times when neither sex needs to be a screaming banshee to make a point. Most normal people can resolve things in an adult manner without behaving like a tantrumy brat.
Bacon&Eggs
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“I think some people on here still live in the 1920's where women weren't allowed to express an opinion!!!”

Nah, don't think it's that,. Part of the attraction of BB is slagging somebody off coz ya feel like it. I do it all the time against BB the bastards. See, great fun
danyell
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“I think some people on here still live in the 1920's where women weren't allowed to express an opinion!!!”

She was more than just expressing an opinion. She was being volitile and aggressive. This thread is right. A man would of been thrown out straight away for what Megan did.
Scarlett Berry
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Belpry_1:
“I agree,

Any male or non-white female would have got a much harsher punishment i.e kicked out

Blatant double standards.”

Oh for God's sake, give it a bl**dy rest.
Scarlett Berry
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Sasparella:
“No some on here live in the times when neither sex needs to be a screaming banshee to make a point. Most normal people can resolve things in an adult manner without behaving like a tantrumy brat.”

Beautifully said Sasp.
tuppencehapenny
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Belpry_1:
“I agree,

Any male or non-white female would have got a much harsher punishment i.e kicked out

Blatant double standards.”

But it's hardly double standards since it's imaginary. You speculated on what you thought might have happened, not what actually did.

The only double standards are in your head.
tuppencehapenny
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“I think some people on here still live in the 1920's where women weren't allowed to express an opinion!!!”

She was hardly expressing an opinion - for one thing she was screaming too loudly to express anything coherently.

Women were of course entirely able to express an opinion in the 1920s. I think your history knowledge needs a little polishing.
BeeBumble
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“If a male housemate acted the way Megan did, then we wouldn't half the amount of threads slagging him off.

Would probably get tons of sympathy with coments like "Don't be so harsh on him, hes probably stressed in that house! or "They've not got any decent food, I'd be the same!" etc etc.

But because Megan is a woman, she gets judged far more harshly for her actions! I've seen it year after year on here!”

Yup, the way most on here were defending Daley for putting his hands round someone's throat is quite scary.
Bacon&Eggs
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by tuppencehapenny:
“She was hardly expressing an opinion - for one thing she was screaming too loudly to express anything coherently.

Women were of course entirely able to express an opinion in the 1920s. I think your history knowledge needs a little polishing.”

Don't be nieve. Most of the hm's play mind games with each other, how do you express yourself in such an atmosphere of manipulation. She's a 23 yr old slip of a girl, not Sigmund Freud.

Go on give her a break.
zx50
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Sasparella:
“No some on here live in the times when neither sex needs to be a screaming banshee to make a point. Most normal people can resolve things in an adult manner without behaving like a tantrumy brat.”

I'm not shocked by her aggressive behaviour, but that it seemed to come from nowhere. I didn't see anyone get in her face first. Tiffany started grinning, but only because I think she wanted what happened with her all forgotten about. If someone's being provoked, I think it's understandable that they verbally lash out. In my opinion, Megan had no justification for verbally lashing out from what I saw.
sutie
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“I think some people on here still live in the 1920's where women weren't allowed to express an opinion!!!”




Ah, Is that what that was last night ? I did wonder.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map