• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
I can't believe Tiffany got a warning too.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Captain Kipper
15-01-2016
What a disgrace...she had banshee woman shouting at her and looming over her, of course she's going to stand up for herself.
CLL Dodge
15-01-2016
And if she and Megan hadn't been restrained they'd both be out talking to the police.
meadows76
15-01-2016
Did she get a warning? I was only half watching but I thought they just spoke to her, didn't realise they gave her a warning too.

She never should have been pulled in to the diary room in any case
mysty211
15-01-2016
Hers wasn't as bad they maybe did it to show both got warning to stop any complaints.
viva.espana
15-01-2016
And she did, so let's not worry about it. Anyone with any objectivity will have been nodding along with Tiffany in the DR. I think even the hapless BB pawn was nodding along with her and cringing at the random nature of the T&Cs he found himself signed up to.

Quite why they felt the need to caution Tiffany on this occasion is, to say the least, suspect.
foxyred
15-01-2016
I know for a fact that I wouldn't just be laying down in my bed whilst someone was there shouting down and leaning over me, I'd at least get myself onto their level, seems the natural thing to do
benbeez1
15-01-2016
ridiculous
Captain Kipper
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by viva.espana:
“And she did, so let's not worry about it. Anyone with any objectivity will have been nodding along with Tiffany in the DR. I think even BB was nodding along with her althought why they felt the need to caution Tiffany on this occasion is, to say the least, suspect.”

Tiffany did nothing wrong IMO.
Sasparella
15-01-2016
That was just a caution, not a formal warning.
meadows76
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Sasparella:
“That was just a caution, not a formal warning.”

That's what I thought, it was just a talk not an actual warning
Fanntastik
15-01-2016
It wasn't a formal warning.
FunboyFandango
15-01-2016
Good grief the Tiffany bias here is getting incredible.

She's not the first and won't be the last to get a warning for that. Off the top of my head Razor Ruddock got a warning for doing the exact same thing, when he stood up and shouted "You ****ing what?!" or words to that effect to Spencer. He was provoked as well but that's not the point.

Wether she started it, or was provoked or not is irrelevant. If you go towards towards another hm in an aggressive manner you get a warning/caution or whatever you want to call it. Always have, always will.

Why should Tiffany be given special allowances?
EnricoIV
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“And if she and Megan hadn't been restrained they'd both be out talking to the police.”

You mean unlike Gemma, who should be talking to them about her theft of Tiffany's shoes?
Captain Kipper
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“You mean unlike Gemma, who should be talking to them about her theft of Tiffany's shoes?”

Yep, she gave them to Tiffany as a birthday present, so they now belong to Tiffany...by legal right.
Stellen11
15-01-2016
It was fully deserved. Its obvious that if gemma hadn't held her back she would have got violent.
Captain Kipper
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Stellen11:
“It was fully deserved. Its obvious that if gemma hadn't held her back she would have got violent.”

Gemma was more aggressive in the way she yanked Tiffany back than anything Tiffany did.
viva.espana
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by FunboyFandango:
“Good grief the Tiffany bias here is getting incredible.

She's not the first and won't be the last to get a warning for that. Off the top of my head Razor Ruddock got a warning for doing the exact same thing, when he stood up and shouted "You ****ing what?!" or words to that effect to Spencer. He was provoked as well but that's not the point.

Wether she started it, or was provoked or not is irrelevant. If you go towards towards another hm in an aggressive manner you get a warning/caution or whatever you want to call it. Always have, always will.

Why should Tiffany be given special allowances?”

Who said she should be given a special allowance? All anyone seems to be saying is that her reaction, in context and in the circumstances, was a normal and reasonable one.
Shantan
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Sasparella:
“That was just a caution, not a formal warning.”

Yeah I agree.
EnricoIV
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Stellen11:
“It was fully deserved. Its obvious that if gemma hadn't held her back she would have got violent.”

Oh sure. Totally obvious.
FunboyFandango
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by viva.espana:
“Who said she should be given a special allowance? All anyone seems to be saying is that her reaction, in context and in the circumstances, was a normal and reasonable one.”

Going towards another hm in an aggressive manner, which is what it was wether you like Tiffany or not, or think she was justified in doing so. Has always been a no no in BB. So why are people surprised she get's a warning?

Also, she wasn't justified in doing it anyway. Megan was the instigator and provoked her no doubt, she is to blame for all of it. But you just can't do that in BB.
davem1234
15-01-2016
The way she jumped from her bed it did look like she was going for her
Captain Kipper
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by davem1234:
“The way she jumped from her bed it did look like she was going for her”

After the ghetto comment, and her looming over Tiffany's bed in a very shouty and aggressive way wouldn't you get out of bed to confront her?
jonny2200
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by davem1234:
“The way she jumped from her bed it did look like she was going for her”

It would be interesting to see what you would do if someone was shouting like a mad person and calling you names, after calling everyone around her '*****', then that person came towards you.... i guess youd just stay laying down on your bed right??

dont see why you have to lie
Stellen11
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by EnricoIV:
“Oh sure. Totally obvious. ”

If it wasn't so obvious she wouldn't have got a warning.
jack_blair
15-01-2016
Originally Posted by Captain Kipper:
“Gemma was more aggressive in the way she yanked Tiffany back than anything Tiffany did.”

she kind of put her arm out and swatted her so Tiffany fell back wards , it came very naturally to Gemma, like she was swatting away a fly
Gemmas a massive stirrer
Tiffany is extremes of being really agreeable and cooperative than she'll just SNAP and it's ugly
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map