• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
stephanie slagging off john during her nom
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Norn2
16-01-2016
there was no need. she only did that to make herself look good to the public
CLL Dodge
16-01-2016
And to make clear her killer nomination wasn't her first choice.
amyawake
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“And to make clear her killer nomination wasn't her first choice.”

Exactly. So the term "slagging off" is used if her choice is disapproved of it would seem. (Rolls eyes)...cos John is such a nice man isn't he? Ha....smh
Blue Jay Way
16-01-2016
she still didn't need to say it. She could have said 'my first chocie has already been picked'

she's sly and devious
Vicky.
16-01-2016
Almost as if the house had just found out how unpopular he was
Warp
16-01-2016
Shame John was slagging her off which made Megan go mental.
erin_p
16-01-2016
Playing to the audience.
momentarything
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by Warp:
“Shame John was slagging her off which made Megan go mental.”

All he did was ask Megan to talk to her about cleaning up after herself because she and Megan were mates? Then when Megan started to kick off, he said, never mind, we'll talk about it tomorrow.

Originally Posted by erin_p:
“Playing to the audience.”

Totally! She'd never have said it in a million years if she hadn't heard the crowd chanting.
FunboyFandango
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“And to make clear her killer nomination wasn't her first choice.”

Didn't BB say that you could nominate someone who'd already been named by someone else?
Rhumbatugger
16-01-2016
She was pathetic, band wagon jumping and hates John JUST as much as Gemma, so there. Wasn't she sitting with John who had his arm round her during the eviction?

I liked her after her dance too, but....didn't last long.
ForGodsSake
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by Norn2:
“there was no need. she only did that to make herself look good to the public”

Yeah just because Heifer got cheered for saying it.

Stephanie is repugnant.

I hope her BF dumps her on live TV.
Sylvia
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by FunboyFandango:
“Didn't BB say that you could nominate someone who'd already been named by someone else?”

I don't think so.
coke_pepper
16-01-2016
She's got the brains and backbone of a rebellious 12 year old.
dialectic
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by coke_pepper:
“She's got the brains and backbone of a rebellious 12 year old.”

Yeh, how dare she rebel against John's authority.
coke_pepper
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by dialectic:
“Yeh, how dare she rebel against John's authority.”

zzzzzzzzzzz.
Rhumbatugger
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by dialectic:
“Yeh, how dare she rebel against John's authority.”

Why should she 'rebel'? Can't she just act like an adult?


Rhetorical question.
Arthur_B
16-01-2016
She had to grovel to the public after the boos she got, so she stuck the knife into the one person who got a worse reception than her.
dialectic
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“Why should she 'rebel'? Can't she just act like an adult?


Rhetorical question.”

I wouldn't say she was ' rebelling'...in her wish to nominate John, I was responding to another who assumed she was. No matter, I don't care much for her, but such a reason for nominating John is justified, from what I can see.
Rain
16-01-2016
To be fair they had not heard from the house in a week, they had no idea who the villain was - they had heard Megan and Gemma denounce John's game playing - so Steph got saved against the odds, good on her for playing against John IMO. Good on Angie for voting the sidekick Kristina too, would love to see her in a double eviction with John lol.

Surprised Stephanie got saved, mays well milk it she had.
Rhumbatugger
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by dialectic:
“I wouldn't say she was ' rebelling'...in her wish to nominate John, I was responding to another who assumed she was. No matter, I don't care much for her, but such a reason for nominating John is justified, from what I can see.”

Gemma had already nominated for that reason, she was just 'mee tooo, because, I don't like him either'. It was pathetic and unnecessary.
dialectic
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by Rhumbatugger:
“Gemma had already nominated for that reason, she was just 'mee tooo, because, I don't like him either'. It was pathetic and unnecessary.”

I think it's good that he heard it from more than one person, perhaps she wanted to back up Gemma there and Megan from the night before.
Rain
16-01-2016
Actually, like it or not, there is a voting category, a range of voting viewers who will not notice and cheer her for it... I reckon she has wanted to say something for a while but did not dare unlike Megan - she hears the Get John Out chants and she finally speaks up. First time they all heard the outside for a week after all...
Rhumbatugger
16-01-2016
Originally Posted by Rain:
“Actually, like it or not, there is a voting category, a range of voting viewers who will not notice and cheer her for it... I reckon she has wanted to say something for a while but did not dare unlike Megan - she hears the Get John Out chants and she finally speaks up. First time they all heard the outside for a week after all...”

Or she just waves with the opinion of who she thinks is popular. And is desperate to stay in so curries the public's favour.

I know which I think is by far the most likely.
KatrinaK
16-01-2016
It was pretty obvious Steph nominated John purely because she heard the crowd reception towards John (and Gemma) respectively. She made that comment purely to win favor with the public. Prior to this, she didn't air any outright negative feeling towards John.

In the end this will be her downfall. It will be ALL thier downfall.
Skyrah
16-01-2016
I am so happy that Majority of FMs have seen through Gemma & Steph's desperate act
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map