Originally Posted by
Elsa:
“I've been baffled for a while, wondering why they propped Kellie Bright so much - even giving her that gorgeous Fred and Ginger song that I think was wasted on her because elegance was just not a card in her hand (though her treatment is a bit of a mixed bag because they generally dressed her horribly...)
But anyway, if it's true that they were propping her, I wondered why. Now I'm thinking that they might be trying to turn Kevin into a linchpin pro (like Brendan and Anton are considered) because surely one of those older guys is gonna have to leave, probably Anton who'll be 50, if not older, this year.
Just from their past behaviour, it looks like they think they need "continuity" male pros, but it's not as important on the female side. Ola and Kristina both have been their "sex kitten" types, so I'd expect they'd be looking for someone like that to replace them...
Oh well, so much for my trying to analyse the situation, but I'm sure they have strategies
when it comes to casting, pairing, propping or whatever - and Kellie, there at the end, seemed to be a blatant case or over-complimenting and scoring - there has to have been a reason.
”
Originally Posted by Mystical123:
“No, there doesn't - it happens almost every year (Lisa Snowdon, Pamela Stephenson, the list goes on). And it's absolutely nothing to do with the pro.
What it is to do with is a little thing called opinion - which all the judges have, and air frequently. Doesn't make them right, but doesn't make them wrong either, it's all subjective. Just as your opinion of Kellie is - it's certainly not a fact that she was over-
complimented and overmarked, that's just what you think. For example, I think she was a class above the others in the final and based on that night should have won. I'm neither right nor wrong, that's just my opinion.
I don't think they "need" continuity male pros either - it's just simply that Anton and Brendan have never quit! Whereas over the years a lot of female pros have. Kristina had been there since series 6, that was continuity. And there's no evidence whatsoever that they'll replace her and Ola with women who are similar to them. Certainly on past form pros have been replaced by completely different dancers (for example Flavia was replaced by Janette / Anya; Katya was replaced by Karen etc.).”
I find it really irritating that people who, for reasons best known to themselves took a dislike to Kellie, continually bleat about her being favouritised, overmarked by the judges etc etc etc!!
I don't actually agree that she was 'a class above all the others' in the final, purely because I think her dances weren't as diverse as particularly Georgia's & I do think the judges got a bit caught up in the enthusiasm with that Tango, four 10's was excessive IMO, but she fully & absolutely deserved to be there as the most consistently (again IMO) good performer throughout the series who never actually did a duff dance & who peaked at exactly the right time!!
I'm sorry but that Fred& Ginger AS routine was one of the dances of the series & far more deserving of the clean sweep than the final Tango ( again IMO!!)
I'm speaking as a massive Georgia fan by the way who absolutely believes the right 3 dancers reached the final & were all three winners!!