Originally Posted by pakokelso93:
“Some more horrible and cringy Rachel Brookes questioning at work. Totally terrible with Vettel... Then Rosberg literally watching a start replay has a joke saying Hamilton should have had a penalty for going off track at T1 and Brookes jumps straight in all serious going "Do you think he should have had a penalty?!"”
Thinking about it, is it any wonder we have heard driver's answer's to questions in Italian recently. We might not be able to understand the question but who cares?
Originally Posted by popeye13:
“I like Rachel Brookes as a presenter. As an interviewer, she is looking for sensationalism every time she speaks and talks to drivers. She wants to provoke something and then stand there with the 'I got a scoop' face almost.
I don't even bother to watch the interviews anymore, she is laughable!”
Agree that there is night and day between her presenting and interviewing abilities but don't know about sensationalism. She just asks crap questions and I find it cringeworthy because the driver is often trying their best to remain respectful and polite whilst thinking "WTF?".
Originally Posted by SmoggyTheTowny:
“A show of complete incompetence from the world of F1 today.
An overall dull race, corner cutting, abuse towards officials, crashing to ward off overtakes, inconsistent stewards and results changed, not once but twice, after the race has finished...
People wonder why the interest in F1 is dropping?”
As much as I have been losing interest in F1, now is not the time to complain after a climax to a race like that.
There was excitement and controversy and gave everyone a reason to keep watching post-race (except for on C4 of course - d'oh!).