Originally Posted by lulu g:
“On the other hand, she is very irascible, so it's not too hard to believe that most of the HMs really do find her hard to live with. Granted, she's not the only one with a foul temper. It's much easier for me to understand them nominating Tiffany than it is to understand them not nominating the other foul-mouthed ranters.”
“On the other hand, she is very irascible, so it's not too hard to believe that most of the HMs really do find her hard to live with. Granted, she's not the only one with a foul temper. It's much easier for me to understand them nominating Tiffany than it is to understand them not nominating the other foul-mouthed ranters.”
It's easier for you to understand them nominating the one who wasn't given a formal warning and who wasn't stopped from going back to the house after the "David is dead" incident, than it is for you to understand them not nominating (barring the few nominations they both did receive for reasons other than their volatile natures) the two who were given formal warnings and were made to stay in a separate room till the next day and till when they had calmed down?
If they wanted to nominate Tiffany for the reasons you stated, that she's foul mouthed and irascible etc, then they should say that. Don't cop out with the "I don't know you as well as everyone else" line.




) can't and he is worried for them 

in Steph's case still it is only Tiff that distresses him. He is coming across as a fool and a wimp and a seriously awful man.
) and had to pick up an old addiction. Meaning he has still not changed his ways, just another drug.