Originally Posted by Alrightmate:
“I don't think it's just about being nominated. I believe it's because she has genuinely made an effort to get on with people. That's why it would hurt.
This isn't just about a random nomination, it's more like a pact that the housemates will nominate her no matter what whether she's been good to them or not.”
“I don't think it's just about being nominated. I believe it's because she has genuinely made an effort to get on with people. That's why it would hurt.
This isn't just about a random nomination, it's more like a pact that the housemates will nominate her no matter what whether she's been good to them or not.”
It's been over a week since the 'Wrong David issue' and I can't remember her getting involved with any arguements since then. Megan came into her space when she was ranting and did step towards her, she rightly reacted yet she got reprimanded by BB.
I think she has taken all that's been said and has tried to make an effort with them but it must feel like 'What's the point .. they're going to nominate me whatever I do' so I do get why she's annoyed.
Stephanie has twice mentioned that Gemma chased and screamed at a 70 year old woman (Angie) but that wasn't shown. Hms are constantly saying they find Gemma intimidating yet she only got a couple of noms. It must be annoying and frustrating to watch and hear it on a daily basis when she is trying to be nice and still gets nominated.




Ihave seen her talk quietly and listen to Gemma, John and Christopher while they filled her in on all her bad behaviour and how she should change. Imagine Megan or Steph or Gemna

Getting angry or speaking your mind isn't volatility.