• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Interesting Jeremy video doing the rounds on Twitter... *WARNING GRAPHIC*
<<
<
7 of 7
>>
>
Eurostar
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by JackieDVD:
“His stupidity in filming it I guess.

No idea how it's leaked but it will get his profile up even more. These things are also sometimes pr deals with the media, to keep an even more damaging story out. And if it's the woman who's posted it to make some money, how the hell could someone in his profession allow someone else access to such videos.”

I'm guessing he must be the source of the video (even though my initial reaction was there was a third party in the room filming). I notice the person who uploaded it to Twitter is Irish as well : I imagine Jeremy sent it to a couple of friends as a means of showing off and now one of them has uploaded it (perhaps not realising they could be landing him in a load of trouble).
jack_blair
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by JackieDVD:
“Something to show his grandkids.”

if he has any sense , he'll get that taken down and fast !
He has lovely friends if one of them put anything up that would do him damage
JackieDVD
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“it may get Jeremy's profile up but not in a good way
Any publicity is good publicity , but not when it's like this !

He'll get offers for p*rn sites like previous HMs , Michelle? (the girl who was after Stuart) and he could join Marc with the Dreamboys, but that's about it, no TV work for him,

A good rule of thumb is "don't put anything on social media that you wouldn't mind being screened in Sainsburys" ”

Depends on the circumstances. This being released may we'll have just been the lesser of two evils. And it's not really going to harm his reputation amongst his peers nor probably his earning potential, like some other, more damaging revelations could have.
jack_blair
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by JackieDVD:
“Depends on the circumstances. This being released may we'll have just been the lesser of two evils. And it's not really going to harm his reputation amongst his peers nor probably his earning potential, like some other, more damaging revelations could have.”

you don't think this is damaging for Jeremy ? = drugs/s*x


He's told Stephanie he's got a bad boy reputation but it's not true, he's really a gentleman he told her

So he's already being showed he's a liar by one vt making the rounds on social media

Stephanie and Jeremy mugging eachother off - so all's fair now , one good thing
Can you imagine Stephanie's family seeing what this guy's really like ?
gelefsky
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“you don't think this is damaging for Jeremy ? = drugs/s*x


He's told Stephanie he's got a bad boy reputation but it's not true, he's really a gentleman he told her

So he's already being showed he's a liar by one vt making the rounds on social media

Stephanie and Jeremy mugging eachother off - so all's fair now , one good thing
Can you imagine Stephanie's family seeing what this guy's really like ?”

Hang on a minute? So the definition of a "gentleman" is that as long as you DON'T partake in sexual activity with a consenting adult, snort a few white ones and film it on your mobile (most likely in his very early 20s in a moment of immaturity), then you CAN be a "gentleman". But if you DO partake in such "depravity" then you can't ever be seen as a gentleman even if you treat people fairly and with respect. Plllease....
jack_blair
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by gelefsky:
“Hang on a minute? So the definition of a "gentleman" is that as long as you DON'T partake in sexual activity with a consenting adult, snort a few white ones and film it on your mobile (most likely in his very early 20s in a moment of immaturity), then you CAN be a "gentleman". But if you DO partake in such "depravity" then you can't ever be seen as a gentleman even if you treat people fairly and with respect. Plllease....”

no that's not what I said,
I'm saying what he's TOLD stephanie about himself
Don't you think that once she sees this VT she will cringe and it will change her opinion of him the fact it's done the rounds on social media

I don't care what this guy does
I'm talking about what she knows about him and what she doesn't know
GrozzyGirl
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“no that's not what I said,
I'm saying what he's TOLD stephanie about himself
Don't you think that once she sees this VT she will cringe and it will change her opinion of him the fact it's done the rounds on social media

I don't care what this guy does
I'm talking about what she knows about him and what she doesn't know”

Except it's Stephanie, and she appears to be a scruffy dirty mare with dodgy ethics, so I'm gonna say she'll think it's fine.
gelefsky
24-01-2016
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“no that's not what I said,
I'm saying what he's TOLD stephanie about himself
Don't you think that once she sees this VT she will cringe and it will change her opinion of him the fact it's done the rounds on social media

I don't care what this guy does
I'm talking about what she knows about him and what she doesn't know”

I hear you Jack, but you said he was a "liar" (=NOT a gentleman)...

"Don't you think that once she sees this VT she will cringe and it will change her opinion of him the fact it's done the rounds on social media"

No. Just like he laughed off the knicker-twist "outrage"...Whether people agree with their relationship or not, I do think they have a very playful and forgiving "bond" and not sure she'd be that bothered to be honest. Now, whether she will continue to see him on the outside and run back to "boyfriend" Sam is a different debate!
JackieDVD
25-01-2016
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“you don't think this is damaging for Jeremy ? = drugs/s*x
”

I did't say that. I said it could be the lesser of two evils, and that it won't damage his reputation amongst his peers or his earning potential like some other more damaging revelations could. The thing he's been exposed doing is par for the course in the circles he mixes. The public also aren't that shocked by celebrities doing such things. So much so, it's the go to 'revelation' in a pr management deal to keep something far more career damaging out of the papers.
<<
<
7 of 7
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map