Originally Posted by Jimmy Connors:
“That's not right.
85.5% at the very least.”
“That's not right.
85.5% at the very least.”
Hmm, give or take 0.07%
Everyone would have moaned either way
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“When people say "everyone", they don't always mean "everyone". When people say after a bad event, "what is wrong with everyone in the world", you're not really wondering what is wrong with each individual person in the world. It's a generalization.
Let me rephrase, "86.67% would have moaned either way".”
“When people say "everyone", they don't always mean "everyone". When people say after a bad event, "what is wrong with everyone in the world", you're not really wondering what is wrong with each individual person in the world. It's a generalization.
Let me rephrase, "86.67% would have moaned either way".”
I guess that "86.67%" doesn't sound as catchy as "everyone" though.
Some of us couldn't really care less. That's the best way to treat BB
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“When people say "everyone", they don't always mean "everyone". When people say after a bad event, "what is wrong with everyone in the world", you're not really wondering what is wrong with each individual person in the world. It's a generalization.
Let me rephrase, "86.67% would have moaned either way".”
“When people say "everyone", they don't always mean "everyone". When people say after a bad event, "what is wrong with everyone in the world", you're not really wondering what is wrong with each individual person in the world. It's a generalization.
Let me rephrase, "86.67% would have moaned either way".”
Why wouldn't it be more like 50%? Or 25% if it was one way, 75% if the other?
But it wasn't actually even an 'either way'. You listed 5 possibilities and than said "And on and on".
So what it comes down to is some people would have moaned no matter who was saved -- something that, if it's even true, deserves a big "so what?".
Originally Posted by geppsdood:
“You speak so much sense. Why can't other people get this?”
“You speak so much sense. Why can't other people get this?”
\always the same
I never scream fix I usually let things go but that was so blatantly obvious it was ridiculous, I hope nobody votes in the next eviction C5
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“If it was Steph- OMG it's cos Sams going in
Jeremy - OMG why are they doing that do they want this 'triangle' to continue.
Daniella - OMG it's cos they are setting her up for the 'journey'
Tiff- It's cos they want an American in the final
Scotty- Because he's the 'Golden boy' and they want him to win.
And on and on. So FIX would have been shouted anyway
Darren would probably be least 'FIX' outrage”
“If it was Steph- OMG it's cos Sams going in
Jeremy - OMG why are they doing that do they want this 'triangle' to continue.
Daniella - OMG it's cos they are setting her up for the 'journey'
Tiff- It's cos they want an American in the final
Scotty- Because he's the 'Golden boy' and they want him to win.
And on and on. So FIX would have been shouted anyway
Darren would probably be least 'FIX' outrage”
No it would not. The way it was done was obvious, that is was has annoyed people, it was fixed for Gemma to stay,she came in last, probably told to. The look on her face said it all.Those handles had nothing to do with the masks popping up
The producers have really gone too far this time, giving someone who would not take part in other tasks the first prize. It stinks.
If they don't want anyone to accuse them of fixing the outcome, then tasks like this should be skill based not pot luck (PMSL). That way, at least they would all have an equal chance of winning immunity.
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Because it's the same thing happening every single time. They leave us in the dark about how these so called twists plan out and then the twist ALWAYS goes in favour of the one housemate that is considered to either be the most disliked or the one that, in their opinion, is bringing the most entertainment.
How can you expect people not to be cynical when it just happens to play out the same way every single time ? It's not even something that happens once or twice every other series. It's happening a few times in every single series.
I can't believe anymore that they are not setting things up to stop certain HM's from being evicted. Gemma probably wouldn't have been evicted in the next eviction anyway, but they can't risk losing her.
Channel 5 are desperate to keep the ratings up for this show, they have shown this time and time again since they got hold of this show. They will do anything to keep their ratings up. There is also proof that they keep things from us, remember the whole thing about Jay taking a dump in the freezer ? that was kept from us. When they are so dishonest every series, people will question the things they do.”
“Because it's the same thing happening every single time. They leave us in the dark about how these so called twists plan out and then the twist ALWAYS goes in favour of the one housemate that is considered to either be the most disliked or the one that, in their opinion, is bringing the most entertainment.
How can you expect people not to be cynical when it just happens to play out the same way every single time ? It's not even something that happens once or twice every other series. It's happening a few times in every single series.
I can't believe anymore that they are not setting things up to stop certain HM's from being evicted. Gemma probably wouldn't have been evicted in the next eviction anyway, but they can't risk losing her.
Channel 5 are desperate to keep the ratings up for this show, they have shown this time and time again since they got hold of this show. They will do anything to keep their ratings up. There is also proof that they keep things from us, remember the whole thing about Jay taking a dump in the freezer ? that was kept from us. When they are so dishonest every series, people will question the things they do.”
I agree and anyone who thinks otherwise must be either stupid or very naive.
2 of 2
