|
||||||||
"I would never degrade a young girl like that" |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
[quote=Janet_Hadfield;81216630] Quote:
But also he's a know it all. He gives people advice when it isn't asked for and he does it in a way as though he's some great sage of wisdom. If he truly had wisdom he'd climb down off his high horse and apologise to Darren for hurting his feelings instead of doggedly sticking to his guns about nominating him for the 'right' reason.[/QUOT
He has apologised to Darren numerous times, he thought he was doing Darren a favour but got it wrong. Darren needs to get over it and stay away from Gemma the stirrer. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,363
|
Quote:
He has apologised - over and over - in fact every time Darren brings it up (which seems to be quite often). It is possible to apologise for hurting someones feelings whilst still maintaining that you did it for the 'right' reason.
Just to add, John seems to be incapable of admitting that he could make a mistake or be wrong about anything. Being right seems to be the most important thing to him. I think this is why he is not so popular within the house. He's intelligent and well educated, but seems a little lacking in the emotional intelligence/empathy department. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,499
|
Quote:
I must have missed the part where he apologised. I've only ever heard him justifying why he did it.
You haven't heard him say several times - 'I'm really sorry for hurting your feelings' (or words to that effect - they've hugged it out a number of times. He hasn't ever said it was a wrong thing to do - but he really has apologised to Darren for hurting his feelings/making him feel like shit and possibly giving out the wrong message. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 14,107
|
Quote:
But also he's a know it all. He gives people advice when it isn't asked for and he does it in a way as though he's some great sage of wisdom. If he truly had wisdom he'd climb down off his high horse and apologise to Darren for hurting his feelings instead of doggedly sticking to his guns about nominating him for the 'right' reason.
Mardy Darren just can't let it go. "It hurt my heart." ffs, you're a grown man not a soppy teenager. GET OVER IT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12,531
|
Quote:
I must have missed the part where he apologised. I've only ever heard him justifying why he did it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,363
|
Quote:
We've seen him apologise at least twice, Kristina said he's apologised many times over, it's Darren that can't let it go because that vile Essex woman keeps putting it in his ear.[/]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-apology_apology |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,239
|
Quote:
I must have missed the part where he apologised. I've only ever heard him justifying why he did it.
Just to add, John seems to be incapable of admitting that he could make a mistake or be wrong about anything. Being right seems to be the most important thing to him. I think this is why he is not so popular within the house. He's intelligent and well educated, but seems a little lacking in the emotional intelligence/empathy department. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,363
|
Quote:
He freely admits to being arrogant. It can be an irritating trait but not an evil one as BB and SOTS seem determined to present
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nr Glasgow
Posts: 12,757
|
The whole addiction thing could have been over and done with, but it's Darren that's kept drawing attention to it.. John was fine to let it go..
I Darren only storyline, he's pretty much played it safe so he will coast to the final and be the first or second out.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 924
|
I don't believe for a minute that John is sorry. I think he is sorry for how it turned out against him, rather than sorry for hurting Darren. I don't understand why a grown man shouldn't be hurt, by the betrayal of a freind. Your freinds should have your back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
He can't win, whatever he does.
Take tonight on BOTS, they showed a clip of John giving sensible advice to Steph. When asked for her comment, Megan says "he's just trying to be Mr Perfect" If he had been seen having a go at Steph for her behaviour, no doubt he would be accused of bullying a young girl. Whatever he does and says is always looked as a negative with his fellow HMs and the BOTS audience.....or should that be the TOWIE audience, as that show seems to have taken over this years CBB ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,860
|
I don't think anyone on BB is evil. Bar Conor. Even Helen wasn't evil. Just a nasty nasty woman.
John admits he's arrogant. And being arrogant can be annoying but it's not 'evil'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,733
|
Quote:
They've done it quite a few times, they were doing it on live feed the night before last, sat at the table by the Diary Room door while Gemma was stuffing her face, as usual. They've done it out at the smoking area and Gemma has taken loads of opportunities to badmouth John right from before when Megan had a go at him. Everything that happens she reports to Tiffany as being caused by him and Tiffany has lapped it up. I thought at one point that she was actually quite astute, but Gemma has got to her too as she did a lot of the others. All that Gemma accuses John of is what she does herself ! Steph might be a pain in the bum at times, but at least she knows what Gemma has been up to.
Just the other day Tiff said that Gemma was the least trustworthy and yet you describe her as lapping up everything Gemma has to say Sorry but that makes no sense and I have no idea why you would say Gemma has got to her as there is no evidence to suggest this but there is plenty to suggest that she is her own woman coming to her own conclusions. I don't understand why some don't want to give her credit for this. Last night appeared to emanate from something Steph said from what we can gather and not Gemma. As for Tiff calling out John last night she has called him arrogant before and I think he actually accepts that, obviously he doesn't accept the manipulation tag but Megan came out with this first and others inside and out of the House have thought this to be the case. I'm not saying it's true but he has somehow managed to give this impression and again this came initially from someone other than Gemma. Finally, all I'd say is that it is pretty clear from what we heard last night that Tiff and John are quite good friends and I don't see any problem with good friends talking like they are particularly when you think of their history IE John trying to get her ostracised and out of the House in the beginning. It's clear she has listened to his advice subsequent to this and is trying to be calmer so they have already had difficult discussions and I don't see why this one is any different. I like them both and can see that neither are perfect but both are great HMs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 13,776
|
Quote:
The whole addiction thing could have been over and done with, but it's Darren that's kept drawing attention to it.. John was fine to let it go..
I Darren only storyline, he's pretty much played it safe so he will coast to the final and be the first or second out.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
He has apologised - over and over - in fact every time Darren brings it up (which seems to be quite often). It is possible to apologise for hurting someones feelings whilst still maintaining that you did it for the 'right' reason.
He justifies it and says he knows Darren is hurt, but he says it in away that implies Darren has no right to be upset. John is not as annoying as Steph, Jeremy, Tiffany,Megan or Gemma but he is extremely repellant because he is older, established and intelligent. He had no reason to nominate Darren other than the real reason , which was, he hoped to eradicate the competition that Darren certainly was at the time. John had so many people to nominate, the only people he was getting along with was Daniella , Nancy, Kristina, David and Darren , yet he chose Darren. John is a complete tw*t And he keeps trying to hide it. I loathe him. |
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
No he doesn't really apologise.
He justifies it and says he know Darren is hurt, but he says it in away that implies Darren has no right to be upset. John is not as annoying as Steph, Jeremy, Tiffany,Megan or Gemma but he is extremely repellant because he is older, established and intelligent. He had no reason to nominate Darren other than the real reason , which was, he hoped to eradicate the competition, that Darren certainly was at the time. John had so many people to nominate, the only people he was getting along with was Daniella , Nancy, Kristian, David and Darren , yet he chose Darren. John is a complete ****. And he keep trying to hide it. I loathe him. ![]() What he isn't sorry for is nominating him and he has no reason to be sorry for that. He thought in his mind he was doing the right thing. It doesn't matter if he was right or wrong to do it, he thought he was doing the right thing. People really need to get over it, i don't see why he should forever be punished for something he did 2 weeks ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 444
|
John is extremely repellent because he's older, established and intelligent?
![]() He must be a complete idiot if he was "playing the game" and thought for one second that nominating Darren would do him any favours. If the game plan went wrong the easiest thing for John to do to get back on track is to back down and accept he was wrong to do it, he hasn't and it doesn't seem he ever will. For me, the Darren situation is evidence that John is not playing a game. It is evidence of his arrogant, sanctimonious nature but that's just who he is! |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
John is extremely repellent because he's older, established and intelligent?
![]() He must be a complete idiot if he was "playing the game" and thought for one second that nominating Darren would do him any favours. If the game plan went wrong the easiest thing for John to do to get back on track is to back down and accept he was wrong to do it, he hasn't and it doesn't seem he ever will. For me, the Darren situation is evidence that John is not playing a game. It is evidence of his arrogant, sanctimonious nature but that's just who he is! Make no mistake he nominated Darren to get rid of opposition, and it's worked because Darren went into a gloomy obsessive sulk, making him far less liked, and people like you actually buy Johns ridiculous story. |
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,211
|
Quote:
John is extremely repellent because he's older, established and intelligent?
![]() He must be a complete idiot if he was "playing the game" and thought for one second that nominating Darren would do him any favours. If the game plan went wrong the easiest thing for John to do to get back on track is to back down and accept he was wrong to do it, he hasn't and it doesn't seem he ever will. For me, the Darren situation is evidence that John is not playing a game. It is evidence of his arrogant, sanctimonious nature but that's just who he is! He's extremely intelligent but he's also very stupid? He's a bit high handed mind, but he's not going to apologise for caring about Darren, which was his intention, misguided though it may have been. Darren, however, is pathetically grateful for Gemma, who, in his little, deluded mind, really 'does' care, by telling him to hold a grudge for ever and to think the worst possible - riiiight. And for Stephanie too, who 'didn't have anything to gain', apparantly, by sticking the knife into John, when everyone had heard the booing and Gemma had already nommed him. Really, really unimpressed by that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,239
|
Quote:
Johns not thick but he's not quite as clever as he thinks he is, he also thinks he's a better actor than he is.
Make no mistake he nominated Darren to get rid of opposition, and it's worked because Darren went into a gloomy obsessive sulk, making him far less liked, and people like you actually buy Johns ridiculous story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
He's apologised for hurting Darren's feeling's, he has said it many times now, do people on here have selective hearing or something ?
![]() What he isn't sorry for is nominating him and he has no reason to be sorry for that. He thought in his mind he was doing the right thing. It doesn't matter if he was right or wrong to do it, he thought he was doing the right thing. People really need to get over it, i don't see why he should forever be punished for something he did 2 weeks ago. And as your ability to gauge time is so poor, I think this conversation is over, nothing for me to learn from you. |
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,211
|
Quote:
Johns not thick but he's not quite as clever as he thinks he is, he also thinks he's a better actor than he is.
Make no mistake he nominated Darren to get rid of opposition, and it's worked because Darren went into a gloomy obsessive sulk, making him far less liked, and people like you actually buy Johns ridiculous story. And that we saw John talk kindly to him a couple of times during this period, trying to help? And that Nancy and Kristina were convinced beyond all doubt that John was trying to help? They're not as clever as the BB audience I suppose. Or you of course. But could you perhaps even think there's a possibility that you arre wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
Spot on.
He's extremely intelligent but he's also very stupid? . Don't lie. Or do you think people can't see self serving idiotic lies, this may be why you appreciate Johns rather unpleasant lying and deviousness. |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
|
Quote:
So why did Darren's odds to win improve after his nomination?
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,363
|
Quote:
He's apologised for hurting Darren's feeling's, he has said it many times now, do people on here have selective hearing or something ?
![]() What he isn't sorry for is nominating him and he has no reason to be sorry for that. He thought in his mind he was doing the right thing. It doesn't matter if he was right or wrong to do it, he thought he was doing the right thing. People really need to get over it, i don't see why he should forever be punished for something he did 2 weeks ago. That's why Darren hasn't moved on and why some of us are still harping on about it. I think John is a bit of a cold fish, unless of course, HE feels hurt, such as when Gemma upset him, or when Winston made homophobic remarks. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:12.





Sorry but that makes no sense and I have no idea why you would say Gemma has got to her as there is no evidence to suggest this but there is plenty to suggest that she is her own woman coming to her own conclusions. I don't understand why some don't want to give her credit for this. Last night appeared to emanate from something Steph said from what we can gather and not Gemma. 