DS Forums

 
 

What Elements of the Moffat Era will Chibnall Keep?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23-01-2016, 02:09
Tom Tit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,454

Wild speculation thread but Doctor Who fandom has been pretty desperate for some discussion points since the season ended so now there is some huge news it's time to speculate.

What elements from the Moffat era do we expect Chibnall to keep?

I think River will retire with Moffat. Hard to imagine anyone else writing her, or wanting to (not because she isn't a good character but she's just such a personal Moffat character I don't think any other writer would want to tread on his toes or feel he had anything to interject into her story) .

What about the Paternoster gang? I'm certain Moffat will use them in his closing season. Will they live on beyond that? There's still spin-off potential there. Could they be put aside for use by Moffat (and maybe Gattiss) in that context?

Missy: she's been such a successful character that it strikes me they will want to keep her around, but again, she's such a Moffat character, it's hard to imagine another writer really doing her justice. Regenerating her too quickly would be such a shame though. Of course, all writers want to make their own mark too.

The general Moffat millieu, his future vision etc: this has been quite distinctive under Moffat. The future church and politics, retro-medieval fashions. It's been done quietly and never discussed that much but there's quite a lot of world building gone on here. His vision of the future has been very consistently portrayed. Will Chibnall and co continue with this vision or will they leave that time period behind and start to build a new 'contemporary future world' for the Doctor to recur in.

UNIT: Chibnall was given the chance to introduce the new UNIT in 'Power of Three' so I have to think this is something he will maintain and possibly even had a hand in discussing the creation of with Moffat? Speculation.
Tom Tit is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-01-2016, 02:10
Whoswho1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,217
Peter capaldi...
Whoswho1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 02:14
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
Seconded.

Generally I'd like Chibnall to have an element of Moffat's more intricate plotting and an in-depth exploration of what makes the Doctor work.
Lord Smexy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 02:15
DiscoP
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,407
I expect the weeping angels will pop back at some point
DiscoP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 02:32
Tom Tit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,454
I certainly hope so. Capaldi is the man to break the three season trend.
Tom Tit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 02:43
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,733
Peter Capaldi, because he's just utterly superb in the role! On top of that, it'll be a new slant for NuWho to take on a new showrunner under an ongoing Doctor. It also now seems more important for someone to break the three-series cycle of leads, as many younger viewers will otherwise presume that's always how it has to be. Capaldi is the man for the job, if he wants it of course.

Kate Stewart is a decent enough 'familiar face' and a good tie to UNIT. If Jemma Redgrave is still up for the role, and Ingrid Oliver would also be keen on coming back as Osgood then the two could logically appear again. And for once these are characters were ageing actors are less of a hurdle to the continuity.

If Moffat doesn't play his 'Doctor's Daughter' card, then maybe Chibnall will?

__

On the other hand I suspect River Song and the Paternoster gang are things to be consigned to Moffat's era... especially seeing as both already feel that way already. River's story is essentially done, whilst the Paternoster's haven't shown up nearly two whole series now.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 02:53
Tom Tit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,454

If Moffat doesn't play his 'Doctor's Daughter' card, then maybe Chibnall will?
Purely a personal preference but God I hope not
Tom Tit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 02:55
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
I expect him to keep the Silurians and UNIT.

And i expect the tone to stay slightly dark as well, considering the stories he has written in the past.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 02:58
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,733
Purely a personal preference but God I hope not
I don't care much for the Series 4 episode in question, but if handled correctly I really wouldn't mind this. It'd give reason to an otherwise needlessly retconned death in the episode (basically dismantling the emotional core of the episode). Admittedly with only twelve episodes a series, I'd also much rather explore wholly new ideas rather than constant retreads.
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 05:05
Brandon_Smith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
I hope the new Headwriter if PC stays writes him a good series that everyone likes new headwriter means alot of new stories and ideas.
Brandon_Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 08:30
andy1231
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,464
If he doesn't keep Peter Capaldi, then the mans a fool.
andy1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 08:31
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
If he doesn't keep Peter Capaldi, then the mans a fool.
I imagine it'll be Peter's choice if he wishes to stay or not.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 09:22
mikey1980
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,514
I imagine it'll be Peter's choice if he wishes to stay or not.
Yes, I would think so. Apart from the case of Colin Baker, it's generally been down to the actor (although Tom Baker might have tested that if he'd decided to stay an 8th year...)

I really hope Capaldi decides to stay on for some of the 'Chibnall era', and I'm sure Chibnall will ask him to, similarly to Moffat asking David Tennant to stay for series 5.
mikey1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 09:39
claire2281
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
I think it's best for him and the show if there is as fresh a start as possible - such as Moffat got. So new Doctor, new companion, only taking a few elements for the last few series. It's far healthier for the show to have a proper new vision and a refresh than having things hanging over from the last guy.
claire2281 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 11:46
Brandon_Smith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
I think it's best for him and the show if there is as fresh a start as possible - such as Moffat got. So new Doctor, new companion, only taking a few elements for the last few series. It's far healthier for the show to have a proper new vision and a refresh than having things hanging over from the last guy.
Actually I agree with this Rtd and Moffat got their own Doctors which might be easier to write for maybe Chibnall should make his own elements and dump Moffat elements only giving them references like Moffat did with the RTD Era.
Brandon_Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 12:32
PaperSkin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,076
Peter Capaldi if he wants to stay and hopefully nothing else, this new era should be aiming to do what the 3rd Doctors era did and completely refresh/regenerate itself and feel and be very different from what came before it.... it needs to for the good of the show,
PaperSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 12:59
Sora2311
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,010
I hope Missy is around for years to come.
Sora2311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 13:21
nattoyaki
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,709
Peter Capaldi. Otherwise for me that will be one of my all-time favourite Doctors (Smith) and one with the potential to be (Peter), who imo arguably has only just or still quite hasn't found his full take on the role, suffering from the poorer aspects of Moffat's run.
nattoyaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 13:50
joe_000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 410
None. Start anew like a mini reboot just as in 2005 and 2010. New Doctor, new companion, new title sequence and theme.
joe_000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 15:57
Isambard Brunel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,087
I think Chibnall will reboot the show free of any baggage. Perhaps in the second series he'll bring back Unit in some form, but I don't think we'll see any more Moffat regulars. I'd be less surprised if we saw him revisit some RTD characters.

I'd also love there to be not even a mention of the Daleks in 2018. I'm hoping series 11 will be more about people (ones you care about) and less about concepts and overblown story arcs with payoffs as enjoyable as a rice cake after a hard day's work.
Isambard Brunel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 18:43
darnall42
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 3,679
None. Start anew like a mini reboot just as in 2005 and 2010. New Doctor, new companion, new title sequence and theme.
yep - fresh new start with a clean canvas
darnall42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 19:04
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
I wonder what the terms of the handover are between Moffat and Chibnall?

Is Chibnall going to inherit Peter Capaldi and the season 10 companion, or is he going to get a blank canvass in the same way Moffat was in 2010?

If Season 10 loses more viewers, the BBC might have to make a tough choice about Capaldi anyway. And Moffat could write a one-season companion in the same way RTD did with Donna for season 4.

I personally would have no problem with Chibnall connecting to other eras of Who - I'd love to see him reconnect with some of the RTD era characters who have been sadly lacking over the past six years.

I hope there will be a lot less timey-whimey stuff though. A full time companion and a likeable Doctor. That's my starter for 10.
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 19:06
Isambard Brunel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,087
yep - fresh new start with a clean canvas
Just a shame we're getting yet another gap year before... yet another Moffat series and then Chibnall takes over the following season. I'd much rather Moffat did a series this year, then left 2017 as a gap year leading to Chibnal's refreshed debut in 2018.
Isambard Brunel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 19:08
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
Just a shame we're getting yet another gap year before... yet another Moffat series and then Chibnall takes over the following season. I'd much rather Moffat did a series this year, then left 2017 as a gap year leading to Chibnal's refreshed debut in 2018.
Me too. Essentially, an 18 month hiatus and then . . . more of the same. Oh, its 1986 all over again!
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 19:12
Isambard Brunel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,087
Essentially, an 18 month hiatus and then . . . more of the same. Oh, its 1986 all over again!
You know, I'd never thought of that. In a way it's almost a perfect epitaph for Moffat, who's managed to become the modern-day JNT - Ironic given what he had to say about that era as a cocky young man.

I wonder if Ian Levine will produce a "Moffat in This Dress" single this time?
Isambard Brunel is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:04.