• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Darren and Chris responsible for knickergate
<<
<
1 of 7
>>
>
Paace
23-01-2016
Those two are responsible for putting them on display .
ChrissieAO
23-01-2016
And John is getting the blame.....
erin_p
23-01-2016
I agree, it was not John ...
BlueStreak
23-01-2016
And now Tiffany is having a go at him.

danyell
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChrissieAO:
“And John is getting the blame.....”

He was the one going on about it to everyone though. Calling it pigeon shit! Horrible thing to call discharge.
BlueStreak
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by danyell:
“He was the one going on about to everyone though. Calling it pigeon shit! Horrible thing to call discharge.”

Not as horrible as leaving your dirty gusset laying around for others to pick up.

Disgusting.

SegaGamer
23-01-2016
I'm not blaming one person, it was all of them. The men acted like children and the 3 girls on the bed were like school girls bullying.
teddybears
23-01-2016
The three of them could have been a bit more mature about it although there was no malice from any of them - Steph really needs to sort out her own dirty underwear out!

(It'll be used as another noose for John's neck though)
danyell
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by BlueStreak:
“Not as horrible as leaving your dirty gusset laying around for others to pick up.

Disgusting.

”

Did they do that maliciously though?
KatrinaK
23-01-2016
John is always the scapegoat. It's always his fault. Grrr
WalterHartright
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by KatrinaK:
“John is always the scapegoat. It's always his fault. Grrr”

He didn't exactly distinguish himself this time.
Paace
23-01-2016
I'm just gobsmacked that all their dirty laundry seemed to be piled together . I thought they all washed there own stuff . No way would I leave a stranger wash my stuff . Different if they had a washing machine, but they have to do any washing by hand .
BlueStreak
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by danyell:
“Did they do that maliciously though?”



Of course not. Steph is being lazy and extremely unhygienic. That's just gross to leave your underwear laying around in a communal house. It's not the first time either if Megan's tantrum over the self same issue the other day/night is anything to go by.

duckylucky
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by teddybears:
“The three of them could have been a bit more mature about it although there was no malice from any of them - Steph really needs to sort out her own dirty underwear out!

(It'll be used as another noose for John's neck though)”

Of course it had malice . It was humiliating . No adult shpuld resort to that
Lily Darling
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by erin_p:
“I agree, it was not John ...”

John may not have put the underwear on the table, but when Christopher covered it up John uncovered it and wanted to name and shame and took great pleasure in it all.
jobielad
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by BlueStreak:
“You are asking if Steph maliciously left her knickers laying around?

Of course not. More like being lazy and extremely unhygienic. That's just gross to leave your underwear laying around in a communal house. It's not the first time either if Megan's tantrum over the self same issue the other day/night.

”

And Danielle has been going on about her leaving stuff around all week.
cah
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by KatrinaK:
“John is always the scapegoat. It's always his fault. Grrr”

It's his fault he started loudly shouting 'It's like Pigeon shit' and 'name and Shame' ,then went in the bedroom declaring loudly for all the others to hear what they'd found and telling them to go and look
bluefb
23-01-2016
It was John that instigated it most of all. "Name and shame" as he said, then spread the word around the house and the girls took over.
Heatherbell
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by Paace:
“Those two are responsible for putting them on display .”

They didn't "put them on display" They dropped them on the table in horror .
The lovely johnny was the messenger who carried the "pigeon shit" gossip to the bedroom .
But in the end none of those ^^^ were the ones who were happy to leave dirty knickers around . That would be steph .
p381
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by ChrissieAO:
“And John is getting the blame.....”

That's because John was the one that wanted to leave them on the table and (in his words) "Name & Shame" the person.
OK, Steph should be more hygenic - but no need to humiliate the girl!
BlueStreak
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by jobielad:
“And Danielle has been going on about her leaving stuff around all week.”

I edited my original post because I think I got wires crossed.

But yes, Danielle and Megan have mentioned Steph leaving her dirty knickers etc laying around.

MACTOWIN
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by bluefb:
“It was John that instigated it most of all. "Name and shame" as he said, then spread the word around the house and the girls took over.”

Exactly.
bluefb
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by BlueStreak:
“Not as horrible as leaving your dirty gusset laying around for others to pick up.

Disgusting.

”

Originally Posted by BlueStreak:
“Of course not. Steph is being lazy and extremely unhygienic. That's just gross to leave your underwear laying around in a communal house. It's not the first time either if Megan's tantrum over the self same issue the other day/night is anything to go by.

”

She left it in the washing basket, with all the other dirty clothes.
erin_p
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by Lily Darling:
“John may not have put the underwear on the table, but when Christopher covered it up John uncovered it and wanted to name and shame and took great pleasure in it all.”

but Steph told Tiff it was John ..it wasn't.
All three men were wrong to go through any of the females laundry...but if Steph didn't leave her crusty drawers lying around it would never have happened.
Heatherbell
23-01-2016
Originally Posted by BlueStreak:
“And now Tiffany is having a go at him.

”

because steph nommed john as her suspect .
<<
<
1 of 7
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map