DS Forums

 
 

Darren and Chris responsible for knickergate


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23-01-2016, 23:43
BlueStreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,481
Except she left it in the washing basket, with all the other dirty clothes.
Didn't she say she was going to wash them with a few other bits? I don't think for one minute they were in the washing basket at all. Given she'd already been told about leaving her dirty knickers all over the place, I'll wager they weren't in any basket at all.

BlueStreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-01-2016, 23:44
Heatherbell
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Scotland .
Posts: 5,660
Except she left it in the washing basket, with all the other dirty clothes.
Which those on laundry duty threw on the table to sort out .
The crusty knickers should not have gone in the laundry . The dirty girl should have swilled them out in the bathroom , but oh no , afraid to mess up her nails .
Heatherbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:45
exodus2u
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,450
As usual John is free from any blame and took no part in it. Just like when he sprung up from his bed and said to Jeremy 'she's mugging you off' which really put Jeremy at ease.
exodus2u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:45
BlueStreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,481
because steph nommed john as her suspect .
She did and wrongly so.

BlueStreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:45
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
because steph nommed john as her suspect .
It wasn't quite like that. Stephanie said Darren, Christopher and John twice, but Tiffany was only having one name from Stephanie and that was John.

That was Gemma style s**t stirring from Tiffany there, it's funny how she is allowed to get away with it though.
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:45
ultros
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Lete River
Posts: 8,206
John may not have put the underwear on the table, but when Christopher covered it up John uncovered it and wanted to name and shame and took great pleasure in it all.
It's his fault he started loudly shouting 'It's like Pigeon shit' and 'name and Shame' ,then went in the bedroom declaring loudly for all the others to hear what they'd found and telling them to go and look
Yes. Christopher said to cover them up, and John said "no we need to name & shame" then went to the bedroom to tell everyone.

Then when Tiffany confronted him he denied it... and on live feed last night was dramatically saying 'I can't believe you would think I would do that Tiffany'.

John is so shady but can do no wrong on here it seems lol.

(Ps. I think he's a good housemate & am glad he's still there )
ultros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:47
Maggie 55
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,492
..but if Steph didn't leave her crusty drawers lying around it would never have happened.
What the hell is wrong with you? Steph said they were in the washing basket, where do you put your dirty underwear?

If someone took your underwear out of the basket and took them to your place of employment and started waving them around pointing out your private secretions what would you think?



Maggie
Maggie 55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:47
Paace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
They didn't "put them on display" They dropped them on the table in horror .
The lovely johnny was the messenger who carried the "pigeon shit" gossip to the bedroom .
But in the end none of those ^^^ were the ones who were happy to leave dirty knickers around . That would be steph .
I thought he came into the picture a bit later but you're right, John is the person who started shouting his mouth off about them .
Paace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:47
Nosedive
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,656
It was John that instigated it most of all. "Name and shame" as he said, then spread the word around the house and the girls took over.

Yup. Just watched it back on Ch5 +1. John to blame untilmately. He denied it to Tiffany as all the dirty laundry was already out on the table by Christopher and Darren so may not have realised that he actually instigated it all after this.
Nosedive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:47
erin_p
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 24,531
Didn't she say she was going to wash them with a few other bits? I don't think for one minute they were in the washing basket at all. Given she'd already been told about leaving her dirty knickers all over the place, I'll wager they weren't in any basket at all.

She claimed they were with other bits she was going to wash later
erin_p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:48
Shantan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,896
Sorry but it was all the guys(except Jeremy) that started it. John wanted to name and shame the person and gleeful was gossiping about it with the other girls and calling it pigeon shit.
Shantan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:49
KatrinaK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,092
It's his fault he started loudly shouting 'It's like Pigeon shit' and 'name and Shame' ,then went in the bedroom declaring loudly for all the others to hear what they'd found and telling them to go and look
and that's exactly my point - John is the escape goat... again.



Lets not blame Darren and Chris who put it on the table.

Least of all.... lets not blame Gemma and/or Danielle, who behaved FAR worse than John did tonight.

Let's just blame master manipulator John. It's all his fault.

I understand the whole 'name and shame' thing wasn't the best thing, or the most tactful, but I don't think there was any malicious intent.

Tiff annoyed me tonight. Regardless of what she said about John was true or not (and I'll be the first to admit he can be a bit of a control freak and arrogant at times).... what about Gemma's behaviour...? Why doesn't Tiff pull her up over her shit...?

but no, it's all John's fault.
KatrinaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:50
bluefb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,097
Didn't she say she was going to wash them with a few other bits? I don't think for one minute they were in the washing basket at all. Given she'd already been told about leaving her dirty knickers all over the place, I'll wager they weren't in any basket at all.

You don't have to think about it, the footage precisely showed Chris taking them out of the basket.
bluefb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:51
digiqueen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,061
It wasn't quite like that. Stephanie said Darren, Christopher and John twice, but Tiffany was only having one name from Stephanie and that was John.

That was Gemma style s**t stirring from Tiffany there, it's funny how she is allowed to get away with it though.
THIS ^^^^^ Steph didn't mention John until Tiff eliminated everyone else leaving her with only one name. Then Tiff told John that Steph had said she knew he'd done it. Talk about twisting a story.
digiqueen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:51
bluefb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,097
Which those on laundry duty threw on the table to sort out .
The crusty knickers should not have gone in the laundry . The dirty girl should have swilled them out in the bathroom , but oh no , afraid to mess up her nails .
Yeah, what a tramp, putting her worn clothes in the wash basket. "Name and shame!"
bluefb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:52
cah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 18,890
but Steph told Tiff it was John ..it wasn't.
All three men were wrong to go through any of the females laundry...but if Steph didn't leave her crusty drawers lying around it would never have happened.
BIB ..No Erin Steph told Tiff she thought it was all 3 it was only after Tiff kept saying out of the 3 give me one name over and over again that she finally said Johnny

As for leaving her pants lying around ,She left them in the Bathroom with some other dirty washing ....Yes she should have and would have been better to wash them straight away ,but she said she was going to wash them later with the other stuff

Christopher was the one that decided to bring the washing out of the Bathroom and go through it ,and it was Chris,Darren and John that then decided to make a big Hooha over what they found to Humilate someone
cah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:52
Sasparella
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12,531
because steph nommed john as her suspect .
Only because she knew that Tiffany wanted her to say John, she virtually spelled it out for her to grasp.
Sasparella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:54
BlueStreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 10,481
What the hell is wrong with you? Steph said they were in the washing basket, where do you put your dirty underwear?

If someone took your underwear out of the basket and took them to your place of employment and started waving them around pointing out your private secretions what would you think?



Maggie
Well, for starters I'd be hacked off that they'd obviously broken into my house I would think.

It isn't quite the same situation is it. It's a communal house she's living in. She should have a bit of decorum. If she's got dirty gussets she should rinse them out discreetly and not shove them in any basket (if that's where they were) for anyone to come across.

BlueStreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:56
cah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 18,890
and that's exactly my point - John is the escape goat... again.



Lets not blame Darren and Chris who put it on the table.

Least of all.... lets not blame Gemma and/or Danielle, who behaved FAR worse than John did tonight.

Let's just blame master manipulator John. It's all his fault.

I understand the whole 'name and shame' thing wasn't the best thing, or the most tactful, but I don't think there was any malicious intent.

Tiff annoyed me tonight. Regardless of what she said about John was true or not (and I'll be the first to admit he can be a bit of a control freak and arrogant at times).... what about Gemma's behaviour...? Why doesn't Tiff pull her up over her shit...?

but no, it's all John's fault.

Noone is saying it was all Johns fault But it was Johns fault the rest of the house got involved due to him acting like a spiteful school girl ,by shouting 'Name and Shame then gleefully going into the bedroom to let all the others know
cah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:57
alimi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 734
but Steph told Tiff it was John ..it wasn't.
All three men were wrong to go through any of the females laundry...but if Steph didn't leave her crusty drawers lying around it would never have happened.
Agree with this, just rinse your undies before you stick em in the wash, especially as it's gross and our undies cost more than most men's so why risk permanant stainage
alimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:01
Sasparella
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12,531
Noone is saying it was all Johns fault But it was Johns fault the rest of the house got involved due to him acting like a spiteful school girl ,by shouting 'Name and Shame then gleefully going into the bedroom to let all the others know
I think the blokes were just being blokey, they do that sort of thing to one another all the time and think nothing of it. The girls however were being foul about it, I sat there with my jaw dropped listening to the vile things they were saying !
Sasparella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:02
KatrinaK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,092
Noone is saying it was all Johns fault But it was Johns fault the rest of the house got involved due to him acting like a spiteful school girl ,by shouting 'Name and Shame then gleefully going into the bedroom to let all the others know
I'm sorry but there was only two people doing that tonight and that was Gemma and Danielle. Megan is also accountable.... yet I don't see anyone - least of all Tiffany - having a go at them.

I think this is what riles me up the most.

Like I said, John shouldn't have said name and shame but I genuinely do not think it was done with malice. Johnny has shown he very big on hygene and cleanisness so maybe he didn't execute what he thought very well.... but I don't think he deserved that interrogation by Tiffany. She saw what went down tonight but of course, it's Johnny that needs the dressing down.
KatrinaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:05
Alrightmate
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
Chris and Darren laid them out on the table.
Chris said they'd better put them in the basket or something and went to reach for them.
John stopped him and said that they should leave them to 'name and shame'.

What Chris tried to do there was respectful.
Alrightmate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:11
Lily Darling
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,859
Chris and Darren laid them out on the table.
Chris said they'd better put them in the basket or something and went to reach for them.
John stopped him and said that they should leave them to 'name and shame'.

What Chris tried to do there was respectful.
This.
Then John starts gleefully shouting about pigeon shit etc. and goes into the bedroom to make sure they all know. What a gentleman. What age is he, 44 or 45? Nice.
Lily Darling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:13
Maggie 55
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,492
She should have a bit of decorum. If she's got dirty gussets she should rinse them out discreetly and not shove them in any basket (if that's where they were) for anyone to come across.

How old are you?

I think Steph has a right to expect that adults are aware of what goes on 'down under' with women and not start waving underwear around going 'Yuk, pigeon shit, pigeon shit'.

How juvenile is that? Have you ever shared a house with someone? Do you think everyone goes around washing their underwear the minute they take them off?

The other women then to start to laugh, criticise and isolate Steph over it is pathetic.



Maggie
Maggie 55 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:40.