DS Forums

 
 

Tiffany is being very disingenuous


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23-01-2016, 23:23
PorkchopExpress
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Lanarkshire
Posts: 3,193

She led Steph to believe that John did the pants thing.
PorkchopExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-01-2016, 23:25
GrozzyGirl
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
She led Steph to believe that John did the pants thing.
He did

Ps I don't think disingenuous is a word
GrozzyGirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:26
Aura101
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,568
but thats what she believed wasnt it ?
Aura101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:27
ICON111
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DS
Posts: 3,101
He did do it through. John was the one being disingenuous.
ICON111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:27
PorkchopExpress
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Lanarkshire
Posts: 3,193
He did

Ps I don't think disingenuous is a word
Right.
PorkchopExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:27
EnricoIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
He did

Ps I don't think disingenuous is a word
p.s. Try using a dictionary.
EnricoIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:27
Theo Rose
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: West London
Posts: 2,038
John was the one who came into the bedroom saying name and shame the person who they belong to.
Theo Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:31
GrozzyGirl
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
p.s. Try using a dictionary.
I know it's in the dictionary, but so are lots of things that are contested.
Believe it or not

It's a double negative really,

A more correct word would be insincere or lying. That's my view on the word anyway.
And still, John did it.
GrozzyGirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:32
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,133
She jumped to a conclusion which fitted with her prejudice. I am not sure that she was disengenous. But she gave me the only belly laugh of tonights HL's show, with her reaction to Megan's eviction. Does she think they are taken out and shot?

Anyway they all jump to wrong conclusions based on their preconceptions of each other so she is still on my Christmas card list.
An Thropologist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:34
GrozzyGirl
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
She jumped to a conclusion which fitted with her prejudice. I am not sure that she was disengenous. But she gave me the only belly laugh of tonights HL's show, with her reaction to Megan's eviction. Does she think they are taken out and shot?

Anyway they all jump to wrong conclusions based on their preconceptions of each other so she is still on my Christmas card list.
I loved her reaction to Megan's eviction, saying she had gone too soon, it was just how she reacted to David's death.
John didn't make that much fuss at his dad's funeral.
GrozzyGirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:36
EnricoIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
I know it's in the dictionary, but so are lots of things that are contested.
Believe it or not

It's a double negative really,

A more correct word would be insincere or lying. That's my view on the word anyway.
And still, John did it.
If it were true you knew, perhaps you would have said "is disingenuous being used in the proper way here" rather than asking if it was a word.
EnricoIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:36
Shantan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,896
John was the one who came into the bedroom saying name and shame the person who they belong to.
Exactly and he was the one calling it pigeon shit.
Shantan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:38
GrozzyGirl
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,791
If it were true you knew, perhaps you would have said "is disingenuous being used in the proper way here" rather than asking if it was a word.
I don't ask if it was a word.
Bloody hell, there are no end of people on here who can't read.
GrozzyGirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:48
EnricoIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,295
I don't ask if it was a word.
Bloody hell, there are no end of people on here who can't read.
He did

Ps I don't think disingenuous is a word
If that's not saying you don't think it's a word, I don't know what is.

And I read just fine. But you're right about there being people here who can't.
EnricoIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:52
Vicky8675309
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,875
LOL, some people have difficulty saying they are sorry or that they were wrong....lol. They come across as disingenuous which is definitely a word even if people don't like it.
Vicky8675309 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:55
Alrightmate
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,755
Turns out she was right though.

Technically John was right. He didn't lay the knickers out on the table, but he was extremely disingenuous there. Being 'technically' right that he didn't put the pants on the table was evading responsibility for what he actually did do.
Alrightmate is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 23:56
FunboyFandango
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,188
She rightly took issue with John over what happened and brought him to task over it.

Daniella and Gemma exacerbated the situation yet Tiffany had no issue with them, she even comforted them when they were upset at being labelled bullies. Double standards?
FunboyFandango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:02
An Thropologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 16,133
Turns out she was right though.
Well not really. There were three of them involved in bringing the knickers to everyone's attention. Tiffiany erroneously excluded the other two from having been jointly responsible and placed the blame only on John. Then having eliminated two of the culprits from her enquiries and drawn her conclusions, she then declares she is going to carry out an enquiry.
An Thropologist is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:06
reader123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,969
He did

Ps I don't think disingenuous is a word
He didn't Chris did then called Darren over first and then John to look at them. Watch it again.

Oh and BTW, Disingenuous is very much a word, it means not being candid or sincere.
reader123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:07
reader123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,969
Turns out she was right though.

Technically John was right. He didn't lay the knickers out on the table, but he was extremely disingenuous there. Being 'technically' right that he didn't put the pants on the table was evading responsibility for what he actually did do.
So why did she not confront the other 2 then. Bit of game playing going on I think.
reader123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:10
jack_blair
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 15,017
I don't think she's being disingenuous

loved it when she said to Stephanie "let the big bad wolf handle it"

she was wrong about who put the underwear on the table, there were all 3 there

but John just got silly & dramatic by saying that the owner of knickers should be named and shamed, that was where he let himself down.

John showed Stephanie up , for a laugh, yet he'd already said he was worried about her when she gets out the house and is quick to give her advice - You wouldn't want an enemy in John !
jack_blair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:11
jack_blair
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 15,017
He did

Ps I don't think disingenuous is a word
it is !
jack_blair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:15
reader123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,969
I don't ask if it was a word.
Bloody hell, there are no end of people on here who can't read.
Didn't you post something patronising before as well.

To insinuate that that there is no end of people on here who cannot read is both rude and patronising.
reader123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:24
teddybears
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 444
I don't think she's being disingenuous

loved it when she said to Stephanie "let the big bad wolf handle it"

she was wrong about who put the underwear on the table, there were all 3 there

but John just got silly & dramatic by saying that the owner of knickers should be named and shamed, that was where he let himself down.

John showed Stephanie up , for a laugh, yet he'd already said he was worried about her when she gets out the house and is quick to give her advice - You wouldn't want an enemy in John !
John didn't know who they belonged to.
He went in to the bedroom to tell the women that one of them needed to claim the underwear.
teddybears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 00:27
jack_blair
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 15,017
John didn't know who they belonged to.
He went in to the bedroom to tell the women that one of them needed to claim the underwear.
yeah, he didn't at first
but he showed her up by wanting to name and shame the owner of the knickers
jack_blair is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:58.