Originally Posted by Jay Lee:
“Are you implying the BBC's Referendum coverage was poor and shoddy? It's a matter of opinion - and I get the majority opinion on Digital Spy is that itv was a dynamic, superb, award winning performance - but BBC One did a good job. If David Dimbleby was presenting on itv, I'm sure he would be lauded here for his authority and experience. Instead, he's seen as a crumbling old dinosaur. Emily Maitlis and Laura Kuenssberg also earned their stripes on the night. There's a reason why 25% of the population stated that they rely on BBC coverage during the referendum, according to the Electoral Commission. When I got into work at 8am yesterday, colleagues wanting to know what was going on instantly went to the BBC News website and were watching the coverage via it.
Anyway, if this isn't bemoaning an injustice on this thread, I don't know what is.”
1st of all I did not say or imply the BBC coverege was poor or shoddy, but the fact is, ITV coverege was as good if not slightly better than the BBC, but got 1/3 of the ratings.
That is not me saying David Dimbleby was an old dinosaur for pete sake, stop getting so offended by people's opinion.
If people on here critise the BBC you very easily throw your toys out the pram. When James was praising ITV the other night, he provanly was doing so because with these type of things it is usually the BBC who are superior and why ITV get lower ratings. But their coverege was as good, should in theory have got better figures.
But they didn't because viewers
automatically turn to the BBC whether one channel has better coverege or not.