I agree. She knew right well that Gemma would kick off and that Daniella was in a vulneable state.

Of course she is. Horrible woman.

Doesn't that slob like people 'keeping it real'. That's all Steph was doing.

Daniella needs to grow up.

Rubbish!! I don't see you blasting Scotty T for nominating Steph for being the most likely to talk behind someone's back, which I disageee with anyway because it's Gemma. Steph is being villified unfairly in this situation again, just like she was in knickergate.

The immunity task questions by BB are worded in such a way that they are meant to cause disruption in the house. That is the purpose of them.

I agreed with what Steph said. I thought Daniella & Gemma totally over-reacted!!! They have been constantly slagging her off & talking behind Steph's back & when Steph stands up for herself & states the way she feels, they villify her. I especially think Gemma has strongly influenced Danniella.

Gemma is totally self absorbed & is a manipulator & treats people like servants like Chris who she expected to run around her. Gemma was horrible to that poor hairdresser!!

Exactly. They weren't asking 'who is the nicest' or 'who does the most around the house', it was deliberately crafted to make people kick off.

Big Brother knew what they were doing by asking such sh*t stirring questions but Stephanie didn't need to go into such detail with her answers, so in a way she should take at least some of the responsibility.

Can't believe she said she was being bullied. You can't poke a dog with a sharp stick and them complain when it goes to bite.

The person most likely to talk behind someone's back is John, Christopher or Darren.

To be fair to the women they are saying too much to each other's faces!! That's their problem with each other. I can't think of anything Gemma, Steff or Daniella think they hadn't been expressed to each other.

Nor is she intimidated. When you feel intimidated do you go around starting confrontations? I don't think so.

Thank you!!

I also think Danniella was giving mixed signals. First she said to a housemate they could nominate her which they did. Then she said that the only thing that might interest her is not immunity but the present, which she said was to do with her kids, which BB never promised & turned out to be Fish N' Chips for the house. Then Steph nominated her & had every right to do so as had all the housemates in that game & she totally flipped out. If anyone else had nominated Danniella I don't think she would have flipped like that. Steph was unfairly villified.

Erm does Collins and Westbrook bother about causing bad feelings? No they dont. They got a bit back tonight and didnt like it and went screaming out the door like idiots.

Yes John does, but Gemma has also been talking behind people's backs. I've seen her talk about a few housemates behind there backs especially if a housemate have been critical of her to her face about something. Later she has a good b*tch about that person.

I've noticed Gemma stirring the others up against someone like Steph. I do agree that they've all ended up saying stuff to each others faces. I also didn't like that Megan was telling Steph she loved her but was too faced behind her back.

Daniella over reacted. Gemma over acted.

I couldnt see fault either with the questions, but then again they were set up to cause bother too..

BB got the aggro they were looking for with the questions. Steph got to rile Danniella and Gemma and take immunity. They got to act the poor victims and flounce out of the house for shopping and cake and talking to family. And Steph got to act the victim when they came back.

Everyone's a winner!