Originally Posted by gelefsky:
“Well, that certainly was NOT my intention. And I apologise if that was or is the case.
As I have explained, I meant the term "baby age" in the CONTEXT of what is being discussed on BB and on this forum!!!!! Not in ABSOLUTE terms. But in terms of the comparison of Steph's age with the OLDER members of the house who she feels have been exploiting her immaturity and lack of full conceptions. SURELY people can understand that and not take the term literally?
As a 40 year old, I know it to be MASSIVELY different (in terms of growth, bone structure and emotional development), than a person of 22. At that age, certain elements of the body are STILL growing. And I can continue to post scientific evidence (like I have done above) of everything I said, showing how one is NOT fully developed yet AT THAT AGE (whether you like to hear that or not). Why does that need to be taken as an insult? Get over yourselves!!
I used the term "baby age" as MANY people do in life as a general term to refer to someone who is very young in the RANGE OF AGES and in terms of Steph's current experiences in there and what she has been saying. That was the CONTEXT”
she's in her 23rd year isn't she ?
everythings developed fully by that age
Hate the excuses given to Stephanie
She gives out many nasty vindictive remarks at Gemma , she's not backward in coming forward , so she should shut up if she's going to bawl her eyes out when she gets same back at her if she can't take it
Most of us know right from wrong by 22, she's always going on about how much she's done , life experience she's had , so she should stop pulling the age card, she's boasted about her 'experience' for long enough , and in her industry she works with people of all ages, so she'll have learned to get on with all ages, more than the average 22 year old,who tend to just mix with peers same age group
She turns on the poor me everytime someone gives her a bit of home truths, she's good at that