Your question implied I was being misogynistic -you were having a pop with your rhetorical question and you know it.

I'd respect you if you acknowledged that rather than acting otherwise.

I've already given suggestions in this thread for humiliation of all housemates including reading out insults to them from other famous people. That would certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons!

You really think that putting in some tweets from blokes that will bed anything in sight, and will even shag a fence if there's no female available is gonna mean anything to Steph ? Makes me laugh that you'd take the word of some Geordie slutboy for anything !

Why are people taking this thread seriously?

Very odd suggestion.

I'm glad your laughing it's proven to be good for your health!

I wouldn't say Mario was as promiscuous as Gaz. Anyway it would give her a chance to defend herself and call it BS.

What's odd about it?

Why should she ? Also why are you so excited about trying to humiliate someone in that way ?

I wouldn't say I was excited.

Of course she doesn't have to deny anything that's her call but she might be appreciative of the opportunity to do so given how badly she's being talked about on social media rightly or wrongly.

If it was revealed that Scotty T had tried to chat up females with blue ticks on Twitter no one would bat an eyelid. Why is it so wrong for Stephanie to do the same with fellas she fancies?

I think it's wrong of her to two-time (I'm old so that word probably is too) her fella whilst in the house (although I do tend to think it may have been pre-planned with him) but the fact that she has chatted up other fellas when single is really no news at all and not something she needs to be ashamed of.

Why do people still insist on trying to make it something shameful that women enjoy sex and can fancy more than one fella in their lifetime?

I think some people would disapprove if Scotty G Shore was revealed to have done that. I don't think they said she chatted them up but more were implying she was begging them for sex one after the other.

Of course there's nothing wrong with women enjoying sex -it's meant to be fun!

What makes you think Steph and Sam planned all of this?

This in a nut shell ^^^^^^

THIS^^^ the OP is deluded

Mag deals and upping there status .

Both Stephanie and Sam appear to have commitment issues. Maybe behind closed doors their relationship isn't as strong as they make out. Recent press stories if they're to be believed suggest Sam is no angel. Scarlett Moffatt from Gogglebox even tweeted that Sam's been direct messaging her friends since last summer. I'd take her word over the Geordie Shore lads.

https://twitter.com/ScarlettMoffatt/...53961846702082

Fellas often say a girl was 'gagging for it' when all she's done is smile at them so I wouldn't read too much into them saying she was begging for sex. She probably asked if they wanted to meet up for a drink sometime.

I go on and off the idea that Steph and Sam planned it. I thought it at first because she was just too quick in looking around in the house to see who to have a showmance with, it was ridiculously contrived by her to partner up with someone and I can't imagine someone in a relationship doing that unless they had pre-planned it for more exposure and mag deals later on when they 'get back together'. Sam has denied it though, so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

To be fair this idea is no more idiotic than the widely held belief that her boyfriend should or will enter the house.

It could be as simple as she met someone else who she has more in common with and wants to be with him it can happen

They'll be a twitter war after the show
by then I don't care who's done what or with whom
they're all pretty promiscuous by sounds of it

he has tweeted he won't be going into the house
I think it's well and truly over between them two now anyway
She's still all over Jeremy and him her, holding hands,cuddling , implying they're going to see eachother after the show too. It won't work out, as none of these reality pairings ever do, moulding into eachother's real life day to day normality never works.

Well, if they are going to bring in witnesses for her defense, as well as her prosecution, in the hypothetical kangaroo court you suggest - an appropriate name could be Your Life on Trial (which they already did with Winston) - along with absolute proof, along with Danniella's former drug dealer, her case worker from whichever rehab she went to, the thousands of girls Scotty's slept with, Darren's former cohorts and his rehab case worker for defense, and so on (I'm sure none of them has been perfect in their lives), then hey, all we need is Judge Rinder!

Good thing we're watching Big Brother though, rather than a show where you have to excuse and apologise for all the errors you've made in your life to an over-eager audience waiting to hang you for every mistake you made from the day you went into the public eye, perhaps even before ... hey, we've got that kid you pushed in the playground when you were 4, he's never forgotten the experience, it marked his life forever

Hey, who needs to wash their knickers in public when we could all watch their life laundry being rinsed for our entertainment.

After that there'll be some public torture and a week's stay in Guantanamo for the winner of the task!

Sounds like a lovely show.

ETA: I'll stick with watching what happens inside the 4 walls of Big Brother studio, there's more than enough drama in there for me.

Love this^^^^^ no truer words spoken....

But I think this is more likely to damage their status?

Your a genius you should apply for a job at the production company! Your full of interesting ideas!

Although for clarity I never ever suggested a Kangaroo court...

Oh and Danniella's caseworker wouldn't be allowed to break the code of client confidentiality.

A kangaroo court is exactly what it would be "an unofficial court held by a group of people in order to try someone regarded, especially without good evidence, as guilty of a crime or misdemeanour".

You may not have said it, but what you suggested amounts to one, in my opinion, especially when in further posts you suggest she could defend herself. She wouldn't need to defend herself on BB if BB didn't introduce the attack in the first place, giving it credence, weight, legitimising it.

Perhaps you didn't mean to word it the way you did, but it sounds very much like you're suggesting exactly that.

ETA: I'll take the 'genius' part though

By saying Steph could defend herself all I meant was I don't think she's a stranger to sticking up for herself.

I don't view it as an attack -big brother could simply announce it over the speaker to the house while their sitting eating a meal together.

Set the scene for some interesting chit chat....

Scotty has already told Jeremy that Stephanie tried to get him too, he used a term that I can't remember now
So that already has been put out on camera !