• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Allegations of Sam Reece controlling and abusing Stephanie
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by hannah:
“Interesting to see what happens after she has come out because him and people close to him deny the accusations.”

The gutter press are having a field day with this.
hannah
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by Rogana Josh:
“The gutter press are having a field day with this.”

Are the press still going on about it
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by hannah:
“Are the press still going on about it”

Apparently check this out!
kitkat1971
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by hannah:
“Interesting to see what happens after she has come out because him and people close to him deny the accusations.”

Well of course. He and everybody in his 'camp' will deny the allegations whether they are true or not.

It does need to be remembered that None of these allegations have come from Stephanie. They are at best 'hear say' if she has told her friends about it.

Steph either needs to completely deny it when she comes out and cut off contact with those friends that have made the allegations or she needs to confirm them and back it up by lodging a complaint with the Police.

Sam can then look at suing for Libel if he wishes and he might have to as they are such damaging accusations.

I suspect that Stephanie won't thank her friends for having made these accusations as even if they are truen she might have preferred to keep it private.
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Well of course. He and everybody in his 'camp' will deny the allegations whether they are true or not.

It does need to be remembered that None of these allegations have come from Stephanie. They are at best 'hear say' if she has told her friends about it.

Steph either needs to completely deny it when she comes out and cut off contact with those friends that have made the allegations or she needs to confirm them and back it up by lodging a complaint with the Police.

Sam can then look at suing for Libel if he wishes and he might have to as they are such damaging accusations.

I suspect that Stephanie won't thank her friends for having made these accusations as even if they are truen she might have preferred to keep it private.”

Its' really strange that just a few nights ago she loved him and was marrying him?
Now this!
hisdogspot
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by Rogana Josh:
“Its' really strange that just a few nights ago she loved him and was marrying him?
Now this!”


... and saying that before she came into the house her life was "perfect"
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Well of course. He and everybody in his 'camp' will deny the allegations whether they are true or not.

It does need to be remembered that None of these allegations have come from Stephanie. They are at best 'hear say' if she has told her friends about it.

Steph either needs to completely deny it when she comes out and cut off contact with those friends that have made the allegations or she needs to confirm them and back it up by lodging a complaint with the Police.

Sam can then look at suing for Libel if he wishes and he might have to as they are such damaging accusations.

I suspect that Stephanie won't thank her friends for having made these accusations as even if they are truen she might have preferred to keep it private.”

They might look too closely at Jeremy then if they are together after that video exposing his use of a 'white substance'.
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by hisdogspot:
“... and saying that before she came into the house her life was "perfect"”

If it was so f*cking perfect she wouldn't be dumping him or has Gillian Mc Keech hypnotised or brainwashed her?
Paace
27-01-2016
Didn't Kristina say something about Steph suffering abuse from a b/f or was that a previous .
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by Paace:
“Didn't Kristina say something about Steph suffering abuse from a b/f or was that a previous .”

Has she got 'previous'?
avon942
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by Paace:
“Didn't Kristina say something about Steph suffering abuse from a b/f or was that a previous .”

That was a previous boyfriend.
hannah
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by Paace:
“Didn't Kristina say something about Steph suffering abuse from a b/f or was that a previous .”

Yes she did she said Steph was in hospital
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by hannah:
“Yes she did she said Steph was in hospital”

I think that was before Sam's time?
hannah
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by Rogana Josh:
“I think that was before Sam's time?”

Yes it was can I just say something regarding Kristina and previous evicted housemates said that Steph talked about Sam a lot.
sheils1
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by foxyred:
“Was that the time they were at a club and she was drunk kissing some guy and had her dress up over her head exposing her arse. What boyfriend wouldn't be happy with that?”

Even if she was doing what you say, its nothing to do with him, she isnt married to him she is her own self.

How she dresses is nothing to do with anyone else and people should mind their own business.
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by hannah:
“Yes it was can I just say something regarding Kristina and previous evicted housemates said that Steph talked about Sam a lot.”

She seemed to be happy enough with him until Jeremy got in the way and IMHO Jeremy is just what we would call up here 'a fly man or a patter merchant'. He wouldn't stay with her as once he got his way with her he would be off again for the next chase.
kitkat1971
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by hisdogspot:
“... and saying that before she came into the house her life was "perfect"”

Exactly.

That's why the suggestion that she has gone in as it is a 'safe' environment where she can have distance and never have to see him again on leaving doesn't make sense.

If she was thinking escape plans through to that extent, was that calculated, she wouldn't be going on about how much she loves him and how perfect her life is.

I'm not saying she'd have got straight in there and told everybody he is a monster who she is desperate to escape, but she wouldn't be bigging him and their relationship up either.

I think she'd probably just try to avoid talking about him at all and play the seriousness of the relationship down.

I think she is just deeply insecure (despite having a very high opinion of her talents) and needy in terms of wanting a boyfriend and fairytale marriage and kids ending. She can't bear to be alone, even for the brief period of BB and then the cabin pressure environment makes the connection to Jeremy even stronger and she is confused.

She is also very volatile and quite sulky. We've seen it, also that she seems to find it hard to take responsibility for her own actions, always blaming other people. If Sam is even close to the same, it is possible that they argue, perhaps in quite horrible ways and if she has related it to friends, they might read that as 'abusive'. Ewually, if Sam has said "i don't want you talking to men because you get drunk and flirty and tactile and they might think you're coming on to them", her friends might also see that as 'controlling'.

Which of course it is in a way, asking (telling) your Partner not to do something or talk to somebody is exerting some level of control but the motivation for it can also be understandable. For example if your partner drinks so much that they aren't safe when out re falling over, going off with strangers, you might tell them not to dirnk as much or at all. Which is trying to control them but done for the best of reasons - to keep them safe.

Really there are so many different possibilities as to what the truth of this situation is and only Sam and Steph can know for sure. Not any of us.
Rogana Josh
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by sheils1:
“Even if she was doing what you say, its nothing to do with him, she isnt married to him she is her own self.

How she dresses is nothing to do with anyone else and people should mind their own business.”

But she was living with him as a common-law-wife and partner.
2la
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by mysty211:
“We don't know this is true also I find it very strange it took her 5 days to come out with this on January 18th,
Sam tweeted his no longer supporting her on January 12th.
Chelsey didn't say anything for days but still tweeted about cbb.
Thats why it seems strange her waiting so many days before saying these accusations rather than right away when he said he was no longer supporting her.

Thats a old article from January the 18th”

Chelsey is Danniellas friend. And it's obvious Danniella has been on twitter. Someone else has too obviously promoting her in the votes etc. But I think Danni has told Chelsey about what Steph has been saying in the house.
mysty211
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by 2la:
“Chelsey is Danniellas friend. And it's obvious Danniella has been on twitter. Someone else has too obviously promoting her in the votes etc. But I think Danni has told Chelsey about what Steph has been saying in the house.”

But Danniella is in the house so how can she tell her? Also the tweet about it only happened on January 18th long before Daniella walked out with Gemma it could easily be a made up story to get Stephanie more support to be less hated.
2la
27-01-2016
Originally Posted by mysty211:
“But Danniella is in the house so how can she tell her? Also the tweet about it only happened on January 18th long before Daniella walked out with Gemma it could easily be a made up story to get Stephanie more support to be less hated.”

Like I said, I believe danniella has used her phone in the house (social media etc). I also think she knew about the allegations before she entered the house. But it seems, going by that report - many did.
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map