So why is she saying in the House, as recently as 3 nights ago, that her life with him was perfect and he was about to propose and she was going to marry him?

Why would she say all that if they weren't happy and she had told him she wanted to split?

She is incredibly infantile.

Sorry i didnt read all your post but firstly she cant finish the relationship as she is in the house and no matter what, people cant turn off and on their feelings.

Lol exactly

I dont know, your asking the wrong person all i think is she has developed strong feelings for Jeremy which she cant help, also she doesnt want to hurt anyone but someone will get hurt.

If you had read all my post you'd have seen I suggested she could have left early to see him and end it properly if the situation was that serious and she cared about his feelings and ending their relationship in a dignified and kind way. Yes, she'd have lost money but wouldn't the feelings of a man you were talking about marrying be more important than that?

Control feelings? No, they can't. Control actions? Yes, they can. No matter how attracted she is to Jeremy, she doesn't need to keep kissing, cuddling him and getting into his bed.

Fair enough, only she can answer.

But surely you see that saying the things she has in the House does not seem to be what somebody that was in an unhappy relationship prior to entering the House (as you suggested) would do?

Why not? shes having fun and no doubt he Sam is doing the same.

Well seems she's made up her Mind now ,if tonights show is anything to go by ...That it's Jeremy she wants to be

I think the whole thing was set up right from the off. Nobody falls for someone else like they did from day one. This series is that poorly 'acted out' that the scripting is standing out by a mile! Gemma's immunity last week was a prime example where everyone could see her lousy acting skills gave the whole thing away. As I say, these two from day one were obvious as were Scotty & Megan....more so given that they have even been on the same show together before this series so that one was a little more so obvious too! BB is getting far too predictable as each series arrives.

Getting on with your life doesn't equal to 'having fun'. Besides Steph hardly seem like she's having fun when she's crying all the time.

I didnt imply anything about getting on with life, all i said was she was having some fun.She cries mostly when people but their noses in her business like anyone would do.

That's because her business is out on display on tv in a house she shares with how many other people. They have the right to but in. She cries because of her guilty conscience and because she's not mature enough to take responsibility for her actions.

I was talking about Sam getting on with his life doesn't empliy he's happy.

People in that house have no right to poke their nose into peoples business, ffs they want to look at their own lives before slagging someone else off.

So we're back to the issue of how committed and serious their relationship is and what constitutes cheating.

If their relationship isn't serious and they don't consider flirting or even snogging to be cheating, just 'having fun' then she has never done anything wrong.

If however, they are in a committed, monogamous relationship, then her behaviour with Jeremy, from virtually the first night, would be considered cheating.

So, i go back to her comments in the House, that BB 'making her friendship with Jeremy out to be something it isn't" "ending her relationship" implies that Sam wouldn't like it, and consider it cheating.

But if she has just met somebody and fallen for them (as you've said in previous posts), it is not just 'having fun' whilst Sam is doing the same and she should give him the consideration to break up with him in person before starting a relationship with Jeremy.

Many of your posts seem very contradictory. In one you claim that they are just young, not a serious relationship so she isn't cheating and has done nothing wrong. In others you're saying they weren't happy, Steph might have told Sam she wanted to split before going in so has done nothing wrong. In others that she was in a relationship but she can't help having met and fallen in love with somebody else and she can't control her feelings so she has done nothing wrong.

It does just seem that you change your defence each time but Steph isn't in the wrong in any of them.

Having seen tonight's, i'm even more convinced she is just emotionally very insecure and damaged and craves attention and affection at all times, mistaking it for love. I feel sorry for her. But i still think she has behaved badly and what she has done, no matter where it comes from, has been cheating.

Obvious answer as to why not re controlling her actions and snogging the face off Jeremy is not wanting to hurt her boyfriends feelings or make him look an idiot on National TV.

But as I said, depends what constitutes cheating to the individual.

I can understand that, especially if someone cheated on you. My pet hates are people who hurt or kill children , animals or people. I also dislike it when we have disasters or terrorist attacks where people lose their lives or are injured so severely their lives are affected.

They are my pet hates.....I tend not to get hung up on people who cheat or lie or say offensive things as much as those things. Maybe I am over sensitive.

They do when it's in their faces all day and they know she has a boyfriend. They have the right to say they don't agree with her behaviour. Constructive criticism is not slagging someone off.

They have no right to question and slag her off, ffs she should start bringing up their past but respect to her she hasnt, if they done this to me i would tell them to mind their own business and look at their own lives.

Of course they have a right to they are all sharing a house and it's right in front of their faces. Having an opinion on her behaviour is not slagging her off.

Silly

Sensible

Oh deary me, well just maybe if they were having sex in bed whilst they were all in the room then yes they would have the right to say something, but alas they are not so Gemma and Daniella need to keep their nasty vindictive opinions to themselves.

Wow

She's a little princess that wants the fairytale but doesn't want to put in the effort of being a proper girlfriend. She wants to be able to kiss and flirt with whoever she likes and flash her arse and other things on a night out and not have anyone to answer to about it to her boyfriend. She wants to be able to go out clubbing and go to work pissed but not have to answer to anyone.

The girl is just so precious but I guess all her life she has been able to get away with it.