Originally Posted by
IWasBored:
“It's attitudes like this that allowed that vicious Helen Wood win in 2014. She was nice towards the end and everyone forgot how naughty she was at the beginning
”
You can't seriously compare Helen's behaviour to Johns.
Helen was vile, absolutely vile and she was vile right the way until the very end. She had moments of softness but then she'll spoil it with being pure nasty and her personal insults were NASTY.
It's obvious that she won at the back of a bookie syndicate when she got a free pass to the final in week 1. She was never a liked housemate and had rows and violent outbursts right the way through. The money task was only 5 days before the final and she again showed her true colours (I have a good memory too.

)
Johnnys behaviour towards Tiffany over Davidgate wasn't pleasent, I agree and I'll be the first to say he came across badly but that was only ONE instant (no, I don't count the Darren nomination), where I think he didn't come across well. However he came across as a saint compared to Helen. Actually scrap that, Gemma came of as saint with all her tantrums compared to Helen Wood. Point being is that since then, he has shown that deep down he is and can be a good bloke. One row 'moment' would not eradicate what we have seen of him since.
This is why Aishleyne (bb7) proved to be so popular that year. Despite her unnecessary row with Nikki and Leah and acting like a brat, the viewers saw her soften throughout the weeks and different sides to her personality. This is what allowed her to come third.
I hope Johnny finishes top3. Despite his flaws - and they all have them - his is not this nasty villain-type housemate.