Originally Posted by Charlie Drake:
“One statement Nick Abbot made, which he was hesitant about saying, was (to paraphrase) 'If you come from a Middle Class background you have more chance of passing the Eleven Plus, therefore you are more intelligent.'
This is a very controversial statement (he knew it would be) and one that I find difficult to agree with. There are many kinds of intelligence (emotional and otherwise).
Also, what about the blurred lines between 'intelligence' and an ability to retain knowledge?”
One of the presenters on LBC (can't remember which one) put forward a notion from an American study. The gist of it was, children from lower-class localities didn't do so well at school and were more likely to fail exams. However, the theory was, if the same children were moved to a middle-class postcode they would more likely succeed at school.
I really didn't understand what bricks and mortar had to do with this argument. Except the concept of being given better opportunities in a more salubrious area. The other factor put forward was, the family background of the lower-class were less likely to encourage their offspring towards studying, hence achieving good exam results.
I don't know what you make of this? I suppose there must be 'a' truth to this study for the fact it's been published, but the tendency towards 'pigeonholing' people I find irritating to say the very least, if not disturbing.
As for the question of intelligence, and those who readily retain knowledge? I believe there are those who have an ability to absorb information much better than others. Perhaps they're more suggestible? However, if you query them, asking for their
own opinion in their field of expertise, often you're left disappointed, well, so I have found.