• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Radio
LBC General Chit-Chat (Part 32)
<<
<
409 of 558
>>
>
Mariesam
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by PhoebeJeebie:
“Uncontrolled immigration is a problem......parents who are told schools are full, Doctors surgeries full to bursting and a patient waiting list, long delays for hospital operations, congested public transport, gridlocked roads.
The U.K. Is a small island and an influx of an extra 5m residents cannot be accommodated without considered planned changes to infrastructure.

Unfortunately the Labour policy under Blair/Brown regarding any form of plan was absent..........everything they touched was a case of "Ready, Fire, Aim"”

Indeed and I see this affecting the German polls next year, and I hope it will, it isn't the immigrants fault who can blame them, but its the fault of the 'elites' which aren't affected in their lives, by mass uncontrolled immigration. Just take the celebrities and liberal elites they don't live in areas that are affected and aren't affected by the stretched unsustainable services.
BanglaRoad
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by plankwalker:
“As JOB makes a big play of that they do not filter his calls, he lets deliberately someone angry to ramble on for ages, as he has obviously been told to cool it. He is doing this for the very reason he says people will be accusing him of when he smugly interjects and tells us just that. He really thinks he is in control of the mind games.

O'B has definitiely had his wrists slapped.”

JOB cuts people off......rude James
JOB let's caller ramble on and make their crazy point....still not good enough.
davidb201
09-11-2016
Good example of JOB's incompetence just now. A girl rang in saying she is frightened for her American friends who are mostly homosexuals (?). When she stumbled and became incoherent, JOB was very avuncular: had this been a caller supporting Trump, he'd have been quick to mock, imitate the stammering and dismiss them. He seems incapable of doing the 'hosting' job he's employed for
balthasar
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by BanglaRoad:
“JOB cuts people off......rude James
JOB let's caller ramble on and make their crazy point....still not good enough.”

Listening to the show today he seems to be letting callers have their say.
Mariesam
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by davidb201:
“Good example of JOB's incompetence just now. A girl rang in saying she is frightened for her American friends who are mostly homosexuals (?). When she stumbled and became incoherent, JOB was very avuncular: had this been a caller supporting Trump, he'd have been quick to mock, imitate the stammering and dismiss them. He seems incapable of doing the 'hosting' job he's employed for”

Most of interviewers can do it, they can take the opposite view or be neutral and question the caller(so they can have a grown up debate with the caller). JOB cant do this, he routinely mocks, is rude and crude to the caller that doesn't share his viewpoint or has a different opinion....
BanglaRoad
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by davidb201:
“Good example of JOB's incompetence just now. A girl rang in saying she is frightened for her American friends who are mostly homosexuals (?). When she stumbled and became incoherent, JOB was very avuncular: had this been a caller supporting Trump, he'd have been quick to mock, imitate the stammering and dismiss them. He seems incapable of doing the 'hosting' job he's employed for”

That's a good example of posting about what you think may have happened in a situation that hasn't happened.
Supersoul
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by gurney-slade:
“Gillian Reynold's tribute to Jimmy Young in today's Telegraph finishes with an unflattering comparison with J O'B. I'll cut and paste it because they have a firewall on some articles for non-subscribers.

"Five decades separate Jimmy Young from LBC’s James O’Brien, who occupies the 10am slot. His is a phone-in show, where he argues with people. He starts with a topical question (Why are we so angry nowadays? Why do we believe rumours not truths?), which he offers as if he were a whip-cracking lion tamer. We are the would-be lions, phoning in, hoping to outwit him and pounce in triumph? It never happens. Any challenge, however smart, is always in vain as O’Brien, like all radio hosts, can stop the contest whenever he wants. And he does.

His professed bias is to the Left of politics, to maintain the station’s overall balance and expound the radical side of arguments. When he outlines his opening proposition, I often agree with him. As he rumbles on, round and round his question, however, interrupting callers before they complete a sentence, twisting and twirling the argument, I want to reach into the radio and wring his neck.

Why do I listen? Because James O’Brien, while taking the art of self-promotion to new heights, says things you’d never hear on the BBC. Last Friday on LBC he called Nigel Farage “Fishface”, adding that he is “the biggest fraud in the history of British politics” who tells people “abject lies”. A BBC boss would be having a fit at the prospect of flying writs. On air it’s a shock, a cheap thrill, probably good business – yet with the lifespan of a mayfly."”

Thanks for quoting that GS. Given there is so much focus on tv, it's refreshing to read a reviews of radio. Gillian Reynolds always writes intelligent articles about the medium. Needless to say she is spot on this time.
BanglaRoad
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by Mariesam:
“Most of interviewers can do it, they can take the opposite view or be neutral and question the caller(so they can have a grown up debate with the caller). JOB cant do this, he routinely mocks, is rude and crude to the caller that doesn't share his viewpoint or has a different opinion....”

JOB questions callers frequently.
He is usually rude to callers who won't accept undeniable facts.
Supersoul
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by davidb201:
“Good example of JOB's incompetence just now. A girl rang in saying she is frightened for her American friends who are mostly homosexuals (?). When she stumbled and became incoherent, JOB was very avuncular: had this been a caller supporting Trump, he'd have been quick to mock, imitate the stammering and dismiss them. He seems incapable of doing the 'hosting' job he's employed for”

Indeed. She was deemed "understandably emotional" which JOB was sympathetic with. Contrast that with those who disagree. They are "inarticulate - filled with rage". His modus operandi laid bare in one show.
PhoebeJeebie
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by BanglaRoad:
“JOB questions callers frequently.
He is usually rude to callers who won't accept undeniable facts.”

The fundamental problem with JOB is he claims to want to give a hearing to other views, but then acts all shocked and offended to discover that there are other views....so immediately puts his size 10 Dr Martens on and gives them a kicking......how nice and liberal of him!!
Crawley Cutie
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by BanglaRoad:
“JOB questions callers frequently.
He is usually rude to callers who won't accept undeniable facts.”

Yes, his 'undeniable' facts
plankwalker
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by BanglaRoad:
“JOB cuts people off......rude James
JOB let's caller ramble on and make their crazy point....still not good enough.”

He's just playing little boy mind games with callers and listeners because he's been told off and The Management can't let him lose. They've taken his toys away. Simples.
Supersoul
09-11-2016
He is not out of touch apparently. "People cannot cope with how in touch I am. I am so focused on being in touch; like a laser." He is utterly humourless apart from when he is being preposterous.

His obsession today is brown people. Reassuring to know he has moved on from vaginas I guess.
Mou Mou Land
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by Supersoul:
“He is not out of touch apparently. "People cannot cope with how in touch I am. I am so focused on being in touch; like a laser." He is utterly humourless apart from when he is being preposterous.

His obsession today is brown people. Reassuring to know he has moved on from vaginas I guess.”

God help us the day when 'brown vaginas' will be the order of the day.
BanglaRoad
09-11-2016
Samuel has an opposite view and is getting loads of time and not being shouted down.
Just thought I'd post this because some folks radios always cut out when this happens.
Nihonga
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by Mariesam:
“Media types like O'Brien still don't get it.....it is the 'Elites' that have had the policies that have mass uncontrolled immigration, which in effect has created the division...if we allowed people to come in who we needed the skills of and did so in a way which wouldn't affect our health services which are constantly stretched to the limit, and housing and schools etc, it would be more acceptable to people because the immigration is manageable..

....its the 'elites' that have allowed this to happen and why people are voting against those 'elites' and media types like James O'Brien still don't get it or don't want to (its easy to call people racist or thick - which he loves to do), people are not in the vast majority against some form of immigration, they are against mass uncontrolled immigration, which affects us all and the services in which we all rely.”

I think the current malcontent goes far deeper than uncontrolled immigration, racism or misogyny or whatever hip label is currently used to describe it. That's what JOB does not get, even as he keeps holding onto that as the reason for its presence. (Racism had no more disappeared when Obama came into power in the US than it did prior to Brexit - it is a ridiculous rose-tinted fallacy to believe, argue or say anything to the contrary.) To explain away the malcontent as an anger towards uncontrolled immigration or Johnny Foreigner (whether it is JOB using it to bash people's head with it or people calling in to offer it as a reason) is a lot easier than make sense of it on a far deeper way that not just expose a profound and complex psychological disconnect that has occured between the people and the political, social, cultural (including the media) and economic institutions that proport to serve them. It is that kind of discourse and thinking that has led us to current discontent: the simplifying, dumbiing down of complex matters into easily digestible soundbites. The disconnect is deep, multi-facted and fragmentary, the main narrative thread being that vast sways of people are now clearly fed-up with or getting thoroughly sick of the useless manner in which they are being or have been governed, not just politically but economically, financially, culturally and socially.

Brexit and Trump were years in the making. None of what is happening should no longer come as a surprise. Even then Brexit and Trump may not assuage the malcontent: I think they may be just symptoms of a deeper malaise currently taking place in western democracies. On their own, they may not be as significant as people are making out - they may be just isolated to those countries; they may not even offer/signify the profound change we think or believe they represent. But that does not mean that going back to the status quo (or politics of old) is the answer: remaining in an unwieldly EU so reluctant, stubborn and slow to reform itself and respond to crises was never going to be the answer; leaving the EU may not offer solutions either. Not that Trump offers the solutions (he may/may not); but certainly and more significantly Clinton did not and does not (Sanders' campaign showed that for many it had little to do with immigration: millennials didn't come out to vote for Clinton. African-American also didn't come out in large numbers to vote for Clinton either. The Democrats have problems of them own.) The way people have responded/are responding to these two voting results may even be senselessly hyperbolic. More evidence, such as what will happen in the French and German elections, may be needed to be sure that something significant is happening in the West. After Clinton, I'm not as certain Merkel is safe. But even if she was, hers is a politics and chancellorship that will be sorely tested. What is uncertain is the shape things are taking and where it is leading us and how to deal with it - these things take time to clearly make themselves known.

The next election/referendum to look out for (and one that may have probable significance for the EU) is the Italian referendum on constitutional reform in Dec. Even that may prove insiginficant. Personally I still think there are more social, financial and economic crises yet to come, with the EU will be shaken and sorely tested by them. And whatever it is that is making the Western electorate break out in p**sed-off rebellion, I don't think the media (JOB included) and politicians know (for all their intellectualising) how to make sense of it and give a coherent narrative, other than to offer nothing but useless shallow patisan soundbites, labels, slogans and (personal) mud-slinging.
Mou Mou Land
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by plankwalker:
“He's just playing little boy mind games with callers and listeners because he's been told off and The Management can't let him lose. They've taken his toys away. Simples.”

I broke my two week break, but have missed the middle part of the program. From what I have heard, I think you are right. He has been told to rein it in.

I will not listen after today, but I give it a week before he is back to normal.

Young lad brought up on a council estate by a single mum and went to Comprehensive school is holding his own. Backtracking from taking the mickey when he learnt the aforementioned facts.
Carolyn_Brown
09-11-2016
I wonder when all those horrified actors are going to move to Canada. Has Jamie Oliver left UK yet like he threatened.
snowy ghost
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by BanglaRoad:
“Samuel has an opposite view and is getting loads of time and not being shouted down.
Just thought I'd post this because some folks radios always cut out when this happens.”

He is great
Charlie Drake
09-11-2016
Oops.
James struggling with a caller.
James says: "You sound intelligent and well-educated - presumably you went to a private school?"
Blimey.
Gusto Brunt
09-11-2016
The hole O'Brien is digging is deep enough to penetrate the Earth's core.

And he's so stupid, he still cannot see it.
snowy ghost
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by Nihonga:
“I think the current malcontent goes far deeper than uncontrolled immigration, racism or misogyny or whatever hip label is currently used to describe it. That's what JOB does not get, even as he keeps holding onto that as the reason for its presence. (Racism had no more disappeared when Obama came into power in the US than it did prior to Brexit - it is a ridiculous rose-tinted fallacy to believe, argue or say anything to the contrary.) To explain away the malcontent as an anger towards uncontrolled immigration or Johnny Foreigner (whether it is JOB using it to bash people's head with it or people calling in to offer it as a reason) is a lot easier than make sense of it on a far deeper way that not just expose a profound and complex psychological disconnect that has occured between the people and the political, social, cultural (including the media) and economic institutions that proport to serve them. It is that kind of discourse and thinking that has led us to current discontent: the simplifying, dumbiing down of complex matters into easily digestible soundbites. The disconnect is deep, multi-facted and fragmentary, the main narrative thread being that vast sways of people are now clearly fed-up with or getting thoroughly sick of the useless manner in which they are being or have been governed, not just politically but economically, financially, culturally and socially.

Brexit and Trump were years in the making. None of what is happening should no longer come as a surprise. Even then Brexit and Trump may not assuage the malcontent: I think they may be just symptoms of a deeper malaise currently taking place in western democracies. On their own, they may not be as significant as people are making out - they may be just isolated to those countries; they may not even offer/signify the profound change we think or believe they represent. But that does not mean that going back to the status quo (or politics of old) is the answer: remaining in an unwieldly EU so reluctant, stubborn and slow to reform itself and respond to crises was never going to be the answer; leaving the EU may not offer solutions either. Not that Trump offers the solutions (he may/may not); but certainly and more significantly Clinton did not and does not (Sanders' campaign showed that for many it had little to do with immigration: millennials didn't come out to vote for Clinton. African-American also didn't come out in large numbers to vote for Clinton either. The Democrats have problems of them own.) The way people have responded/are responding to these two voting results may even be senselessly hyperbolic. More evidence, such as what will happen in the French and German elections, may be needed to be sure that something significant is happening in the West. After Clinton, I'm not as certain Merkel is safe. But even if she was, hers is a politics and chancellorship that will be sorely tested. What is uncertain is the shape things are taking and where it is leading us and how to deal with it - these things take time to clearly make themselves known.

The next election/referendum to look out for (and one that may have probable significance for the EU) is the Italian referendum on constitutional reform in Dec. Even that may prove insiginficant. Personally I still think there are more social, financial and economic crises yet to come, with the EU will be shaken and sorely tested by them. And whatever it is that is making the Western electorate break out in p**sed-off rebellion, I don't think the media (JOB included) and politicians know how to make sense of it and give a coherent narrative, other than to offer useless shallow soundbites, labels, slogans and mud-slinging for all their intellectualising.”

Thanks
Amazing post
MartinRosen
09-11-2016
Just come in (before going out again!), so haven't had a chance to catch up on the thread.

A couple of thoughts, if nobody has mentioned -

Is the election still rigged, Mr Trump ?

After Brexit, the American election, maybe a certain Mr Corbyn is rubbing his hands with glee !!
Jamie6767
09-11-2016
Refreshing to hear JOB being torn a new one by Samuel now. And JOBs incorrect assumption that he was privately educated was delicious to listen to.
Mou Mou Land
09-11-2016
Originally Posted by Jamie6767:
“Refreshing to hear JOB being torn a new one by Samuel now. And JOBs incorrect assumption that he was privately educated was delicious to listen to.”

Ah, but after much reversing he did say 'I am only teasing you'.

Cobblers Mr O'Brien, you got caught out.


ETA - Jesus, he is crawling up the lad's arse further than he does Sadiq's at the moment.
<<
<
409 of 558
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map