Originally Posted by BanglaRoad:
“Heh, if he had gone on much further he probably would have!
BTW why is this Parkinson and Mirren piece of history in the news?
Didn't hear the introduction so guessed that one of them has a book out and this is part of the publicity campaign”
Morning....been away working so couldn't post yesterday but I did hear NF yesterday on Parkinson/Mirren and the Sarah Fergusion MOS story was astonished in how they were covered and how NF handled them. He is fast becoming my least favourite host on LBC because of the poor way he handles things that he either disagrees with or wants to twist in a certain direction.
The Parkinson interview is something from another time and although NF did say that he then just brushed that aside by keeping pursuing the line that Parkinson was brushing it away by saying he was "Yorkshire" and he twisted the comment made by MP in the interview about HM being a "serious" actress.
Then on SF Andrew Piearce came on and had an over the top go at the story......allowed to happen by NF.
The agendas involved behind all this needs to be remembered of course. NF allows that not to be fully explored whilst talking over people, twisting comments, and allowing comment by people to go unchecked.
Sounds very poor IMO and whilst he is part of the general mix of wide opinion on LBC, it shows why NF's was a top "tabloid" editor with all the worst aspects that has to happen and hold to succeed.