Originally Posted by The_Moth:
“Gently and politely patronising and purposely misrepresenting the concept of 'freedom of movement" simply to confuse the guy.
Still it was marginally better than the way he dealt with the "corporate governance" issue in which he suggested that ordinary workers are too dim to understand the big words that board members use and then took two calls from people that ran their own companies as evidence that the idea cannot work. Frankly why even mention it if he is not going to address it properly?”
“Gently and politely patronising and purposely misrepresenting the concept of 'freedom of movement" simply to confuse the guy.
Still it was marginally better than the way he dealt with the "corporate governance" issue in which he suggested that ordinary workers are too dim to understand the big words that board members use and then took two calls from people that ran their own companies as evidence that the idea cannot work. Frankly why even mention it if he is not going to address it properly?”
Yes he was very disparaging re workers on boards ...tried to be self effacing by saying "what if they dont like you etc".




”


